Skip to content

docs(shadow): Lior antigravity check - log codex drift#3333

Merged
AceHack merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
lior/shadow-log-0100Z
May 15, 2026
Merged

docs(shadow): Lior antigravity check - log codex drift#3333
AceHack merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
lior/shadow-log-0100Z

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 15, 2026

Logged Codex dirty worktree drift and Lior metadata churn.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 00:51
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 76928ce9e3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new research log entry documenting detected “Codex dirty worktree” drift and related backlog/metadata churn observations, capturing corrective actions for operational hygiene in the shadow/lesson-log stream.

Changes:

  • Introduces a new docs/research/ entry describing the detected drift and its symptoms.
  • Records corrective discipline steps for cleaning worktrees and stale PR branches.

Comment thread docs/research/2026-05-15-lior-shadow-lesson-log-codex-dirty-worktree.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/research/2026-05-15-lior-shadow-lesson-log-codex-dirty-worktree.md Outdated
- Add Scope/Attribution/Operational status/Non-fusion disclaimer headers
  per GOVERNANCE.md §33 (file imports external agent broadcast signal)
- Remove trailing whitespace on metadata churn line
- Fix `PR 3325` → `#3325` for GitHub auto-linking

Addresses Codex P2 thread + two Copilot threads on PR #3333.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

AceHack commented May 15, 2026

Fixed all three reviewer findings in 65c7865:

  • Added §33 boundary headers (Scope/Attribution/Operational status/Non-fusion disclaimer) per GOVERNANCE.md §33 — file imports Vera's broadcast signal
  • Removed trailing whitespace on the metadata-churn line
  • Fixed PR 3325#3325 for GitHub auto-linking

@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 15, 2026 01:09
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 65c7865da8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/research/2026-05-15-lior-shadow-lesson-log-codex-dirty-worktree.md Outdated
…iteral

Replace bold-markdown labels (**Scope:** etc.) with literal line-start
labels (Scope:) as required by check-archive-header-section33.ts.
Simplify Operational status to enum-only value 'research-grade'.

Addresses Codex review thread PRRT_kwDOSF9kNM6COoFc.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 15, 2026 02:16
@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

AceHack commented May 15, 2026

Fixed section-33 header format (ec8125b): replaced bold-markdown labels with literal line-start labels and simplified Operational status to enum-only value research-grade.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comment thread docs/research/2026-05-15-lior-shadow-lesson-log-codex-dirty-worktree.md Outdated
… Vera broadcast as ephemeral

Addresses copilot thread PRRT_kwDOSF9kNM6CPMlT — the incident record cited
"#3325 was preserved into archival memory" and "Vera's broadcast (2026-05-14T23:47:03Z)"
without repo-resolvable pointers.

- #3325 archival: points to docs/pr-discussions/PR-3325-fix-memory-sync-...md
- Vera's broadcast: notes it as ephemeral bus envelope (no in-repo artifact)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AceHack AceHack merged commit e8c40ff into main May 15, 2026
21 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the lior/shadow-log-0100Z branch May 15, 2026 03:10
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2026
* docs(shadow): Lior antigravity check - log codex drift

* docs(research): add §33 boundary headers and fix reviewer findings

- Add Scope/Attribution/Operational status/Non-fusion disclaimer headers
  per GOVERNANCE.md §33 (file imports external agent broadcast signal)
- Remove trailing whitespace on metadata churn line
- Fix `PR 3325` → `#3325` for GitHub auto-linking

Addresses Codex P2 thread + two Copilot threads on PR #3333.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(shadow): Lior antigravity check drift report 2026-05-15

* fix(shadow-log): grammar "1 file" + trim trailing whitespace

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants