docs(archive): preserve PR 3264

docs/pr-discussions/PR-3264-shard-tick-2139z-minimal-shard-real-dependency-wait-on-3263.md

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+---
+pr_number: 3264
+title: "shard(tick): 2139Z \u2014 minimal shard; real-dependency-wait on #3263 (no actionable findings)"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-14T21:43:23Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-14T21:45:29Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-14T21:45:29Z"
+head_ref: "shard/tick-2139Z-minimal-real-dependency-wait-otto-cli-2026-05-14"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-14T21:49:43Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #3264: shard(tick): 2139Z — minimal shard; real-dependency-wait on #3263 (no actionable findings)
+
+## PR description
+
+## Summary
+
+Tick 2026-05-14T21:39Z minimal shard. Per the [2001Z precedent](docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2001Z.md): when CI-wait is real + bounded + no actionable atom exists from audit sweep, the substrate-honest tick output IS the shard itself.
+
+## Audit sweep (no clean atom surfaced)
+
+| Audit | Findings | Atom for this tick? |
+|---|---|---|
+| `audit-backlog-items` (depends_on / composes_with / duplicate-IDs) | 0 / 0 / 0 | n/a |
+| `audit-memory-index-duplicates` | 0 | n/a |
+| `audit-rule-cross-refs` | 39 candidates | requires 9-variant taxonomy — not single-tick |
+| `audit-machine-specific-content` | 46 findings | mostly doc-context inside code-blocks |
+| `audit-orphan-role-refs` | many | mostly archive surfaces |
+
+## Pattern codified: minimal-shard at natural rest vs Standing-by-failure
+
+| Aspect | Standing-by-failure | Minimal-shard at rest |
+|---|---|---|
+| Real-dependency named? | No | Yes (PR #3263 CI wait) |
+| Bounded? | No | Yes (CI clears in minutes) |
+| Audit sweep done? | No | Yes — no clean atom |
+| Tick output | "Holding" string | Substantive shard documenting state + audit-sweep table |
+
+Future-Otto in same state: run sweep → write shard → don't force substantive PR.
+
+## Prior-tick
+
+[#3258](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/pull/3258) (shard 2128Z + tally/glob fix) merged as `82ac778`.
+
+## Session running tally
+
+25 merged + 1 wait-ci (#3263) + this shard's PR.
+
+## Test plan
+
+- [x] Composite branch-guard
+- [x] `markdownlint-cli2` + `audit-md032-plus-linestart` clean
+- [x] `gh pr create --head` explicit ref
+- [ ] CI clears
+- [ ] Auto-merge
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T21:45:47Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Adds the 2026-05-14T21:39Z hygiene-history tick shard documenting a bounded real-dependency wait on PR #3263 and recording that an audit sweep did not surface a clean single-tick “atom” to pursue.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Adds a new tick shard file for 2139Z capturing refresh/hold/audit/verify/visibility notes.
+- Records the audit sweep results and the “minimal-shard at rest” vs “standing-by-failure” comparison table.
+
+
+<details>
+<summary>Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)</summary>
+
+**docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2139Z.md:32**
+* P1 (xref): The `never-be-idle.md` link target is also relative and will resolve under the tick directory (`.../2139Z.md`’s folder), producing a broken link. Switch to a root-relative target like `/.claude/rules/never-be-idle.md` (or use backticks as in other tick shards).
+```
+No clean single-tick atom surfaced. Per
+[`never-be-idle.md`](.claude/rules/never-be-idle.md): meta-check passes
+— there ISN'T a structural factory change that would have made any of
+```
+**docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2139Z.md:41**
+* P1 (xref): This link uses `docs/.../2001Z.md` as a relative path, which will resolve under `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/` and break. Since `2001Z.md` is in the same directory, link to `2001Z.md` (or use an absolute `/docs/.../2001Z.md`).
+```
+Per the 2001Z precedent's
+[minimal-shard pattern](docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2001Z.md):
+when CI-wait is real + bounded + no actionable atom exists, the
+```
+</details>
+
+### COMMENTED — @AceHack (2026-05-14T21:48:46Z)
+
+_(no body)_
+
+## Review threads
+
+### Thread 1: docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/2139Z.md:13 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T21:45:46Z):
+
+P1 (xref): These markdown links to `.claude/rules/...` are relative to the tick file’s directory, so they resolve to `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/.claude/...` and will 404. Use root-relative links (e.g., `/.claude/rules/...`) or follow the surrounding tick convention of referencing rule files in backticks without a link.
+
+This issue also appears in the following locations of the same file:
+- line 30
+- line 39
+
+**@AceHack** (2026-05-14T21:48:46Z):
+
+Substantive catch — confirmed. Post-merge cleanup landed via PR #3269: replaced 3 broken relative links with plain backtick paths (matching established shard-authoring convention).