docs(archive): preserve recently merged PRs 3233-3226#3236
Merged
Conversation
Per-product persona doc for KSK (Kinetic Safeguard Kernel) using the B-0485 template: Primary personas (3): - ksk-agent-developer — engineers integrating "am I allowed to do this?" checks into AI agents - ksk-robotics-designer — consent-first robotics / actuator system designers (NVIDIA Thor Homeland-Security clearance lineage) - ksk-security-engineer — engineers building KSK itself in Lucent-Financial-Group/lucent-ksk Secondary (1): - ksk-clearance-deployer — Homeland-Security / clearance-aware deployers Adjacent (1): - ksk-compliance-auditor — SOC 2 / HIPAA / ISO 27001 auditors consuming KSK signed receipts Refused (2 — HARD LIMITS): - ksk-refused-weapons-control — autonomous-weapons / kill-chain designers using KSK as a "consent UI" wrapper over a kill chain. Per methodology-hard-limits HARD LIMIT #1 + #3: laundered consent + violates consent-first design intent (PR #2892). - ksk-refused-apt-operator — nation-state APT operators using KSK as a privilege oracle (receipt-replay, authorization enumeration, "stealth mode" feature requests). Per mechanical-authorization-check: APT operators are not in the authorization-source list. KSK's terminal purpose is human-in-the-loop refusal of impactful AI actions; the refused-persona screen is structural to KSK's value, not a side concern. Closes B-0488 acceptance: - [x] Template from B-0485 applied - [x] Grey-hat / ethical researcher framing folded into security-engineer (per glossary's "small bit of code that gets disproportionate review" framing — the engineering itself IS the ethical-research operating mode for this product) - [x] At least 2 refused personas with explicit HARD LIMITS rationale (R1+R2) - [x] Output doc committed at canonical path - [x] B-0488 status: open -> in-progress (closes on PR merge) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Preserves five recently merged PRs (#3226, #3227, #3228, #3232, #3233) as archival markdown under docs/pr-discussions/. The PR also bundles in an unrelated new persona-map document (docs/personas/ksk-personas.md) and a status change to backlog row B-0488.
Changes:
- Adds five PR-discussion archive files capturing descriptions, reviewer overviews, and unresolved review threads for the merged PRs.
- Adds a 452-line KSK persona-map document closing B-0488.
- Updates B-0488 frontmatter
statusfromopentoin-progress.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3233-...md | Archive of merged PR #3233 (shard tick 2034Z). |
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3232-...md | Archive of merged PR #3232 (extend zeta-expected-branch rule). |
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3228-...md | Archive of merged PR #3228 (B-0519 RCA patterns 5/6). |
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3227-...md | Archive of merged PR #3227 (BACKLOG.md index drift shard). |
| docs/pr-discussions/PR-3226-...md | Archive of merged PR #3226 (BACKLOG.md regeneration). |
| docs/personas/ksk-personas.md | New KSK persona map (out of scope per PR title). |
| docs/backlog/P1/B-0488-...md | Status flipped to non-enum value in-progress. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
docs/backlog/P1/B-0488-ksk-persona-map-2026-05-14.md:4
- This change updates
statusbut does not update thelast_updatedfrontmatter field. Pertools/backlog/README.md, thelast_updatedYAML frontmatter must be updated on every content edit to a per-row backlog file.
status: in-progress
…nce) `in-progress` is not a valid frontmatter status enum — valid values per tools/backlog/README.md are open/closed/superseded-by-B-NNNN/deferred. Reverts to `open` so generate-index.ts stays schema-correct. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated preservation discipline. Capturing alignment drift and review friction into native repository memory.