docs(archive): Lior preservation discipline for recently merged PRs

docs/pr-discussions/PR-3184-shard-tick-1851z-pr-3179-arithmetic-fix-3181-mise-rerun.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+---
+pr_number: 3184
+title: "shard(tick): 1851Z \u2014 PR #3179 arithmetic fix + #3181 mise rerun"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-14T18:55:01Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-14T18:56:58Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-14T18:56:58Z"
+head_ref: "shard/tick-1851Z-pr3179-arith-fix-and-3181-rerun-2026-05-14"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-14T19:18:11Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #3184: shard(tick): 1851Z — PR #3179 arithmetic fix + #3181 mise rerun
+
+## PR description
+
+## Summary
+
+Tick 1851Z recovers two in-flight Otto PRs:
+
+### PR #3179 (1841Z razor-cadence batch 4 shard)
+
+Codex left 2 new P2 threads — both real findings:
+
+1. **Arithmetic mismatch**: shard said "29/29 cross-references LIVE" but the deduplicated category breakdown sums to 28 (\`6 + 12 + 7 + 3\`). Root cause: \`B-0421\` was double-counted as both a "backlog-row file" reference (in peer-call-infrastructure.md cross-refs) AND one of the "3 backlog rows" (B-0326, B-0327, B-0421). Corrected to 28/28; cumulative razor-cadence tally adjusted 113/114 → 112/113.
+
+2. **Placeholder vs real glob**: step 4 said "\`ls docs/backlog/P*/B-NNNN-*.md\`" — Codex correctly noted \`B-NNNN\` is placeholder shorthand, not a working glob. Updated to show explicit per-row commands (\`ls docs/backlog/P*/B-0326-*.md\`, etc.) + labeled \`B-NNNN\` as placeholder.
+
+Fixes at commit \`24449f6\` on the #3179 branch; both threads resolved via GraphQL.
+
+### PR #3181 (1846Z razor-cadence batch 5 shard)
+
+Still hit by mise rate-limit lint failures from prior tick. Reran failed jobs via \`gh run rerun --failed\` on workflows 25879019441 + 25879019454. Gate BLOCKED → wait-ci with autoMerge armed.
+
+## Mechanization candidate
+
+\`tools/hygiene/audit-shard-arithmetic.ts\`: parse category breakdowns from tick shards + verify totals sum. Composes with B-0506 worktree-prune cadence. Not filed this tick (per-tick value < new-tool-PR cost).
+
+## Test plan
+
+- [x] PR #3179 commit \`24449f6\` lands the 2-line arithmetic + glob fix
+- [x] Both Codex threads on #3179 resolved
+- [x] PR #3179 gate transitioned BLOCKED → wait-ci
+- [x] PR #3181 reruns kicked off; gate BLOCKED → wait-ci
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T18:56:03Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Tick shard documenting recovery actions on two in-flight PRs: arithmetic/glob fixes applied to PR #3179 after Codex review, and CI reruns for PR #3181 to clear mise rate-limit failures.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Adds a single new tick-history file under `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/` documenting the 1851Z tick.

docs/pr-discussions/PR-3187-shard-tick-1856z-pr-3181-thread-fix-multi-otto-branch-state.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+---
+pr_number: 3187
+title: "shard(tick): 1856Z \u2014 PR #3181 thread fix + multi-Otto branch-state untangle"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-14T19:02:05Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-14T19:04:11Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-14T19:04:11Z"
+head_ref: "shard/tick-1856Z-pr3181-thread-fix-otto-cli-2026-05-14"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-14T19:18:10Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #3187: shard(tick): 1856Z — PR #3181 thread fix + multi-Otto branch-state untangle
+
+## PR description
+
+Tick 1856Z. 3 Copilot threads on PR #3181 fixed (terminology consistency, glob command, rule count denominator) + multi-Otto branch-state untangle procedure documented.
+
+All 3 of my open PRs now healthy. Cumulative razor-cadence: 20/50 rules audited (40%), 134/135 LIVE (99.3%).
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T19:06:39Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+This PR adds a new hygiene-history tick shard (1856Z) documenting the resolution of three Copilot review threads on PR #3181 (terminology/glob/denominator fixes) and captures a “multi-Otto” local branch-state untangle procedure for future reference.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Added tick shard documenting the PR #3181 thread resolutions and the resulting branch push.
+- Documented a repeatable “branch-state untangle” workflow to avoid committing/pushing onto the wrong local branch.
+- Recorded current state of the author’s open PRs and CI/auto-merge status.
+
+## Review threads
+
+### Thread 1: docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1856Z.md:5 (unresolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T19:06:38Z):
+
+Tick shards under docs/hygiene-history/ticks/ are documented as schema'd rows (docs/hygiene-history/ticks/README.md:53-58) and the repo has a validator (tools/hygiene/check-tick-history-shard-schema.ts) that expects the first non-empty line to be a 6-column pipe row beginning with `| <ISO timestamp> |`. This shard starts with an H1 heading instead, so it won’t be machine-parseable/collatable if that tooling is used. Consider adding the schema row as the first line (keeping the narrative below), or updating the README/validator if the heading-based format is now the intended standard.

docs/pr-discussions/PR-3189-shard-tick-1903z-razor-cadence-batch-6-4-foundational-rules.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+---
+pr_number: 3189
+title: "shard(tick): 1903Z \u2014 razor-cadence batch 6 (4 foundational rules, 20/20 LIVE)"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-14T19:04:52Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-14T19:07:02Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-14T19:07:02Z"
+head_ref: "shard/tick-1903Z-razor-cadence-batch6-otto-cli-2026-05-14"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-14T19:18:09Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #3189: shard(tick): 1903Z — razor-cadence batch 6 (4 foundational rules, 20/20 LIVE)
+
+## PR description
+
+Batch 6 razor-cadence audit. 4 foundational rules; 20/20 cross-refs LIVE.
+
+Cumulative: **24/50 rules audited (48% — halfway)**; **154/155 LIVE (99.4%)**.
+
+Notable health signal: `zeta-expected-branch.md` references rule→hook→core→test chain (4 files), all LIVE. The mechanization is intact and consistent with its rule documentation.
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T19:06:08Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Adds a single tick log file documenting batch 6 of the razor-cadence audit, recording that 20/20 cross-references in 4 foundational rules are LIVE and reaching the 48% audit midpoint.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Adds new tick shard under `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/`
+- Reports cumulative audit progress (24/50 rules, 154/155 LIVE)
+- Notes the rule→hook→core→test chain integrity for `zeta-expected-branch.md`

docs/pr-discussions/PR-3192-shard-tick-1905z-razor-cadence-batch-7-4-more-rules-14-14-li.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+pr_number: 3192
+title: "shard(tick): 1905Z \u2014 razor-cadence batch 7 (4 more rules, 14/14 LIVE)"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-14T19:07:35Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-14T19:09:42Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-14T19:09:42Z"
+head_ref: "shard/tick-1905Z-razor-cadence-batch7-otto-cli-2026-05-14"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-14T19:18:09Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #3192: shard(tick): 1905Z — razor-cadence batch 7 (4 more rules, 14/14 LIVE)
+
+## PR description
+
+Batch 7 razor-cadence audit. 14/14 LIVE. Cumulative: **28/50 rules (56%); 168/169 LIVE (99.4%)**.
+
+Note: `wake-time-substrate.md` is a meta-rule with no concrete file refs — describes the discoverable-surface discipline generically. Audit treats the surface directories as the testable units (4/4 LIVE).
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T19:10:02Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Adds a new hygiene-history tick shard documenting razor-cadence batch 7 cross-reference audit results (4 additional rules) and recording that all testable references were verified LIVE.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Added tick log for 2026-05-14T19:05Z capturing batch 7 audit scope, counts, and verification method.
+- Recorded cumulative razor-cadence progress metrics and deduplication discipline notes for B-0160.

docs/pr-discussions/PR-3194-shard-tick-1908z-razor-cadence-batch-8-4-more-rules-17-17-li.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+---
+pr_number: 3194
+title: "shard(tick): 1908Z \u2014 razor-cadence batch 8 (4 more rules, 17/17 LIVE)"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-14T19:12:48Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-14T19:14:31Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-14T19:14:31Z"
+head_ref: "shard/tick-1908Z-razor-cadence-batch8-otto-cli-2026-05-14"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-14T19:18:08Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #3194: shard(tick): 1908Z — razor-cadence batch 8 (4 more rules, 17/17 LIVE)
+
+## PR description
+
+Batch 8 razor-cadence audit. 17/17 LIVE. Cumulative: **32/50 rules (64%); 185/186 LIVE (99.5%)**.
+
+Reference taxonomy now stable: concrete | glob | template-path | backlog-ID | legacy-noted | transient | anti-pattern. Each requires distinct audit logic.
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T19:15:18Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Adds the 19:08Z hygiene tick shard documenting batch 8 of the razor-cadence cross-reference audit and its cumulative progress.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Records batch 8 audit results for four additional `.claude/rules` files.
+- Adds cumulative audit visibility and a developing reference-classification taxonomy.
+- Captures lessons for distinguishing stale pointers from legacy, transient, template, and anti-pattern references.
+
+## Review threads
+
+### Thread 1: docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1908Z.md:29 (unresolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T19:15:17Z):
+
+P1: The template-path count is internally inconsistent: the batch table lists 4 template paths for `claude-code-loading-taxonomy.md`, and the parenthetical here names four classes (skills, agents, tick-shards, user-scope MEMORY.md), but the count/status says 5/5. Please reconcile the count (or name the fifth class) so the 17/17 total is auditable.
+
+### Thread 2: docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/1908Z.md:63 (unresolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T19:15:18Z):
+
+P1: This backticked audit command is not valid shell syntax (`wc` treats `>=` and `1` as filenames/operands rather than a comparison). Since this line is defining the mechanizable taxonomy, please rewrite it as prose or use a valid test/count expression so future automation does not copy a broken check.