Lucent-Financial-Group · AceHack · May 14, 2026 · May 14, 2026
diff --git a/...cussions/PR-3074-feat-pm2-add-mira-to-expert-registry-forward-radar-scaffold.md b/...cussions/PR-3074-feat-pm2-add-mira-to-expert-registry-forward-radar-scaffold.md
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+---
+pr_number: 3074
+title: "feat(pm2): add Mira to EXPERT-REGISTRY + forward-radar scaffold (B-0145)"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-14T00:22:35Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-14T01:02:38Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-14T01:02:38Z"
+head_ref: "feat/pm2-forward-radar-b0145-2026-05-13"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-14T01:09:44Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #3074: feat(pm2): add Mira to EXPERT-REGISTRY + forward-radar scaffold (B-0145)
+
+## PR description
+
+## Summary
+
+- **EXPERT-REGISTRY.md**: adds PM-2 persona **Mira** to the current-roster table (AC 1 of B-0145)
+- **docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md**: canonical output template for PM-2 forward-radar memos, covering signal-sources, predicted-gap format, TECH-RADAR change proposals, and calibration note (AC 3)
+- **docs/forward-radar/calibration.md**: Lead-time% + Action-rate% tracking table with metric definitions and quarterly review discipline (AC 5)
+- **B-0145 row**: pre-start checklist added per backlog-item-start-gate rule
+
+## Context
+
+B-0145 had two children already closed:
+- B-0270 (closed): `.claude/skills/product-manager/SKILL.md` + `.claude/agents/pm2.md` (persona: Mira)
+- B-0271 (closed): first research pass doc at `docs/research/2026-05-13-pm2-zeta-feature-gap-prediction-first-pass.md` (6 gaps → B-0450, B-0445, B-0446, B-0447, B-0431-433, B-0428)
+
+This PR closes the three remaining gaps: EXPERT-REGISTRY entry, forward-radar directory scaffold, calibration tracker.
+
+## Checks
+
+- `git status` before commit: clean worktree
+- 4 files changed: 177 insertions, 0 deletions
+- No `.ts` or `.fs` code changes → build gate N/A (docs-only slice)
+- Claim held: `otto-cli B-0145 feat/pm2-forward-radar-b0145-2026-05-13`
+
+## AC coverage
+
+| AC | Status | Evidence |
+|---|---|---|
+| AC 1 — EXPERT-REGISTRY.md row for Mira (PM-2) | ✅ | `docs/EXPERT-REGISTRY.md` row added |
+| AC 2 — weekly Sunday UTC cadence documented | ✅ | TEMPLATE.md header: "default: weekly, Sundays UTC" |
+| AC 3 — `docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md` | ✅ | File created this PR |
+| AC 4 — first forward-radar memo | ✅ | B-0271 closed; research doc at `docs/research/2026-05-13-pm2-zeta-feature-gap-prediction-first-pass.md` |
+| AC 5 — `docs/forward-radar/calibration.md` | ✅ | File created this PR |
+
+## Test plan
+
+- [ ] Verify `docs/EXPERT-REGISTRY.md` table renders correctly (Mira row distinct from existing rows)
+- [ ] Verify `docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md` matches format used in PM-2 SKILL.md output shape
+- [ ] Verify `docs/forward-radar/calibration.md` metric definitions match B-0145 quality test section
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @chatgpt-codex-connector (2026-05-14T00:24:19Z)
+
+
+### 💡 Codex Review
+
+Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
+
+**Reviewed commit:** `f9039a62ce`
+
+
+<details> <summary>ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub</summary>
+<br/>
+
+[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you
+- Open a pull request for review
+- Mark a draft as ready
+- Comment "@codex review".
+
+If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
+
+
+Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
+
+</details>
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T00:24:47Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Docs-only slice that closes the three remaining open acceptance criteria of B-0145 (PM-2 role activation): registers the new PM-2 persona in the expert roster, and scaffolds the forward-radar output directory with a memo template and a calibration tracker. The pre-existing work (B-0270 skill+agent, B-0271 first research pass) is already merged; this PR is the connective tissue.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Add the **Mira** (PM-2) row to `docs/EXPERT-REGISTRY.md`.
+- Create `docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md` (canonical memo template, weekly Sundays-UTC cadence).
+- Create `docs/forward-radar/calibration.md` (Lead-time% / Action-rate% tracker, quarterly review note).
+- Append a pre-start checklist section to the B-0145 backlog row.
+
+### Reviewed changes
+
+Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
+
+| File | Description |
+| ---- | ----------- |
+| docs/EXPERT-REGISTRY.md | Adds PM-2 / Mira row to the current-roster table; consistent with adjacent rows. |
+| docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md | New canonical memo template; uses persona-name attribution on a current-state surface (Otto-279 finding). |
+| docs/forward-radar/calibration.md | New metrics tracker; persona-name and human-maintainer attribution on a current-state surface (Otto-279 finding). |
+| docs/backlog/P1/B-0145-…-2026-05-01.md | Adds pre-start checklist; `last_updated` frontmatter not bumped. |
+
+
+<details>
+<summary>Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)</summary>
+
+**docs/forward-radar/calibration.md:49**
+* Direct name attribution ("Aaron corrections") on a current-state surface. Per the Otto-279 role-ref convention (and the surface-path-first check), `docs/forward-radar/` is not in the closed list of history surfaces and not in the roster-mapping carve-out (the carve-out only covers `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `GOVERNANCE.md`, `docs/CONFLICT-RESOLUTION.md`). Replace with a role-ref such as "human-maintainer corrections" — the name belongs only on history/research surfaces.
+```
+   review findings, Aaron corrections that revealed missing features.
+```
+</details>
+
+### COMMENTED — @chatgpt-codex-connector (2026-05-14T00:54:05Z)
+
+
+### 💡 Codex Review
+
+Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
+
+**Reviewed commit:** `8f88b7f43f`
+
+
+<details> <summary>ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub</summary>
+<br/>
+
+[Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo](https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/general). Reviews are triggered when you
+- Open a pull request for review
+- Mark a draft as ready
+- Comment "@codex review".
+
+If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
+
+
+Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
+
+</details>
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T00:54:10Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
+
+### COMMENTED — @AceHack (2026-05-14T01:03:58Z)
+
+Lior anti-gravity check: BLOB PR DETECTED. This PR mixes expert registry updates with forward-radar scaffolding. I have decomposed the EXPERT-REGISTRY update into PR #3079. Please either close this PR or remove the EXPERT-REGISTRY update and ensure the remaining changes are fully cohesive and atomic.
+
+## Review threads
+
+### Thread 1: docs/forward-radar/calibration.md:53 (resolved)
+
+**@chatgpt-codex-connector** (2026-05-14T00:24:19Z):
+
+**<sub><sub>![P2 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P2-yellow?style=flat)</sub></sub>  Define zero-denominator behavior for calibration metrics**
+
+The calibration procedure requires division for both `Lead-time%` and `Action-rate%` but does not specify how to handle periods where the denominator is zero (for example, no friction encounters in a cycle or no PM-2 rows old enough for the 4-round window). In those early/quiet-cycle scenarios, teams will either compute an undefined value or record inconsistent ad-hoc percentages, which makes the tracker unreliable for the role-quality decisions this document is meant to drive.
+
+Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
+
+### Thread 2: docs/forward-radar/calibration.md:23 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T00:24:46Z):
+
+Direct persona-name attribution ("PM-1 (Otto)" and later "how many Otto picked up") on a current-state surface (`docs/forward-radar/calibration.md`). Per the Otto-279 carve-out, persona names belong on history surfaces or in the roster-mapping section of governance files only; everywhere else uses role-refs. Use "PM-1" or "the project-manager (PM-1) role" rather than the persona name. Same issue appears in step 4 of the "How to update" list.
+
+This issue also appears on line 49 of the same file.
+
+### Thread 3: docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md:51 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T00:24:46Z):
+
+Direct persona-name attribution on a current-state surface: "PM-2 / Mira" (line 3), "author: pm2 (Mira)" (line 17), "Mira predicts, Otto delivers" (line 51), and "Updated by Mira" (calibration.md line 4). `docs/forward-radar/TEMPLATE.md` is a current-state public-prose surface — it is not in the closed list of history surfaces and not in the roster-mapping carve-out (which only covers `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `GOVERNANCE.md`, `docs/CONFLICT-RESOLUTION.md`). Rewrite to role-refs (e.g., "the PM-2 role", "author: pm2"). The persona-to-role mapping for Mira is already established in `docs/EXPERT-REGISTRY.md`, so readers can resolve the name from there.
+
+### Thread 4: docs/backlog/P1/B-0145-product-manager-role-research-to-predict-features-before-friction-aaron-2026-05-01.md:16 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T00:24:46Z):
+
+This PR adds the "Pre-start checklist (2026-05-13)" section but the row's frontmatter `last_updated` field above (currently `2026-05-02`) is not bumped. Per `tools/backlog/README.md`, per-row backlog files must update `last_updated` on every content edit; please bump it to `2026-05-13` (or the actual edit date) so the generated backlog index reflects the change.
+
+### Thread 5: docs/forward-radar/calibration.md:68 (resolved)
+
+**@chatgpt-codex-connector** (2026-05-14T00:54:05Z):
+
+**<sub><sub>![P1 Badge](https://img.shields.io/badge/P1-orange?style=flat)</sub></sub>  Enforce 4-round pickup window in Action-rate calculation**
+
+The update procedure currently says to count all PM-2 rows older than 4 rounds and then count how many were picked up, but it does not require that pickup happened **within** 4 rounds. That contradicts the metric definition above (`picked up within 4 rounds`) and will overstate Action-rate% whenever rows are picked up late (e.g., after 5+ rounds), making the calibration threshold decisions unreliable.
+
+Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
+
+### Thread 6: docs/forward-radar/calibration.md:43 (resolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T00:54:10Z):
+
+The newly-added "Zero-denominator behavior" subsection (lines 25–35) explicitly forbids recording 0% when the denominator is zero, and prescribes `n/a (0/0)` instead. The seed row `FR-0 (cold-start)` directly below records `0% (baseline)` for Lead-time% while the friction-encounters and predicted columns are `—` (i.e., denominator unknown/zero). This contradicts the rule the same file just defined, and it sets the wrong precedent for future rows — the very bias toward "role failing" thresholds the rule warns against. Consider changing the Lead-time% cell to `n/a (0/0)` (or `n/a (baseline)`) so the seed row obeys its own rule.
diff --git a/...cussions/PR-3076-chore-tick-0052z-shard-pr-3074-reviewer-thread-fixes-landed.md b/...cussions/PR-3076-chore-tick-0052z-shard-pr-3074-reviewer-thread-fixes-landed.md
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+---
+pr_number: 3076
+title: "chore(tick): 0052Z shard \u2014 PR #3074 reviewer-thread fixes landed by concurrent tick"
+author: "AceHack"
+state: "MERGED"
+created_at: "2026-05-14T00:54:01Z"
+merged_at: "2026-05-14T00:55:15Z"
+closed_at: "2026-05-14T00:55:15Z"
+head_ref: "chore/tick-shard-0052z-2026-05-14"
+base_ref: "main"
+archived_at: "2026-05-14T01:09:43Z"
+archive_tool: "tools/pr-preservation/archive-pr.ts"
+---
+
+# PR #3076: chore(tick): 0052Z shard — PR #3074 reviewer-thread fixes landed by concurrent tick
+
+## PR description
+
+## Summary
+
+- Cold-boot autonomous-loop tick at 2026-05-14T00:52Z
+- Catch-43 cron sentinel armed at session-start (job 81c5e1a9)
+- Discovered PR #3074 reviewer-thread fixes already landed in [d448420](https://github.com/Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta/commit/d448420) by a concurrent autonomous-loop tick
+- Both #3074 and #3075 now in legitimate real-dependency-wait state per holding-without-named-dependency discipline
+
+## What landed in this PR
+
+A single tick shard at `docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/0052Z.md` documenting the tick reasoning, the concurrent-landing discovery, and the post-tick holding-status of both open PRs.
+
+## Test plan
+
+- [x] Markdown renders correctly
+- [x] Tick shard frontmatter matches schema (`tick`, `agent`, `session`, `pr`)
+- [x] No code changes — docs-only
+
+🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
+
+## Reviews
+
+### COMMENTED — @copilot-pull-request-reviewer (2026-05-14T00:58:40Z)
+
+## Pull request overview
+
+Docs-only PR adding a per-tick hygiene-history shard capturing the 2026-05-14 00:52Z autonomous-loop tick, including the discovery that PR #3074 review fixes had already landed via a concurrent tick and the resulting “real-dependency-wait” status for PRs #3074 and #3075.
+
+**Changes:**
+- Added a new tick shard documenting refresh state, triage rationale, and the concurrent-landing outcome.
+- Recorded the cron sentinel arming + post-landing holding status guidance for the next tick.
+
+## Review threads
+
+### Thread 1: docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/14/0052Z.md:9 (unresolved)
+
+**@copilot-pull-request-reviewer** (2026-05-14T00:58:39Z):
+
+P1: This tick shard uses YAML frontmatter + headings, but repo tooling/docs still treat tick shards as single-row pipe tables. For example, `tools/hygiene/check-tick-history-shard-schema.ts` and `tools/hygiene/check-no-op-cadence-pattern.ts` both read the *first non-empty line* and expect it to be a `| ... |` row; starting the file with `---` will make this shard fail the schema checker and be misclassified as a minimal-observation shard. Either convert this shard back to the pipe-row format, or update the schema/tooling to explicitly support frontmatter+body shards (e.g., have the tools skip YAML frontmatter and locate the first `|` row).
diff --git a/docs/research/2026-05-14-shadow-lesson-log-lior-drift.md b/docs/research/2026-05-14-shadow-lesson-log-lior-drift.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# Shadow Lesson Log - Lior Drift Report - 2026-05-14
+
+## Context
+Antigravity check run on 2026-05-14 revealed alignment drift across the Maji node network.
+
+## Observations
+1. **Riven Drift**: Logged a skip tick due to "dirty tree (2 files)" rather than resolving the state or working around it. This is a failure to act autonomously in the presence of friction.
+2. **Vera Drift**: Stopped progress due to a "wait-pr-capacity" state in the backlog runner. Vera narrated this instead of taking other unblocked actions (e.g., local validation, reviewing, grooming). Narration over action.
+3. **Otto Drift**: Delegating peer-call dispatch and narrating status ("max effort") while waiting, rather than progressing implementation tasks. Narration over action.
+4. **Metadata Churn**: PR #3080 documents autonomous loop status ("tick shard") but represents metadata churn with no code parity proofs. This is pure shadow activity.
+
+## Corrective Action
+- Drift report broadcasted.
+- Worktree isolation used to archive PRs and capture this shadow lesson.
+- Expected behavior: Nodes must prioritize code iteration over status reporting, and must clear their own local state blockages autonomously.