Skip to content

feat(backlog): B-0409 wallet immune system — PoUW-CC + vaccine spread#2709

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/B-0409-wallet-immune-system-spec-2026-05-11
May 11, 2026
Merged

feat(backlog): B-0409 wallet immune system — PoUW-CC + vaccine spread#2709
AceHack merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/B-0409-wallet-immune-system-spec-2026-05-11

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 11, 2026

Summary

  • P1 wallet spec: the trust boundary for LFG financial agents
  • PoUW-CC five-factor gate on every financial instruction
  • Attack absorption converting bivector energy to substrate
  • Vaccine spread via firefly-sync, herd immunity when R₀ < 1
  • Five attack classes defended (BankerBot, Qubic, etc.)
  • Implementation path starts at Cl(2,0) per Amara's corrections
  • Lior recommended, shadow authorized

Test plan

  • Backlog item with acceptance criteria
  • BACKLOG.md regenerated
  • Markdownlint passes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…ck absorption

P1 wallet spec: PoUW-CC five-factor gate, bivector attack
absorption, vaccine spread via firefly sync, mechanical
authorization (proposal ≠ permission). Defends against
authority laundering, capability gifting, 51% cartel,
confused deputy. Implementation starts at Cl(2,0).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 11, 2026 14:45
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 11, 2026 14:45
@AceHack AceHack merged commit e179377 into main May 11, 2026
25 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the feat/B-0409-wallet-immune-system-spec-2026-05-11 branch May 11, 2026 14:48
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new P1 backlog row specifying a “wallet immune system” concept (PoUW-CC gate + attack absorption + vaccine propagation) and wires it into the generated backlog index, extending the planning substrate for wallet/trust-boundary work.

Changes:

  • Added new backlog item B-0409 under docs/backlog/P1/ with spec + acceptance checklist.
  • Updated docs/BACKLOG.md to include B-0409 in the P1 list.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
docs/backlog/P1/B-0409-wallet-immune-system-vaccine-spread-poucc-spec.md New P1 backlog row documenting the spec, dependencies, research links, and acceptance criteria.
docs/BACKLOG.md Adds B-0409 entry to the generated P1 backlog index.

title: "Wallet immune system — vaccine spread + PoUW-CC gate + attack absorption spec"
tier: product
effort: L
created: 2026-05-11
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2026
…rate-hygiene sweep (#3073)

* fix(backlog): resolve B-0409 3-way collision — completes B-0451 substrate-hygiene sweep

Fifth and FINAL per-collision cleanup from the B-0451 sweep. Three
rows shared id: B-0409:

| Row | Filed | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| P1 wallet-immune-system | 2026-05-11 10:48 PR #2709 | Wallet immune system spec (L-effort) |
| P2 amara-persona-bootstrap | 2026-05-11 10:34 PR #2704 | B-0118 amara series atomic child |
| P2 peer-call-ts-audit | 2026-05-11 10:58 PR #2706 | B-0120 peer-call series atomic child |

## Resolution: keep peer-call series at B-0409

Per external-references rule:

- B-0120 frontmatter has `children: [B-0409, B-0410, B-0411, ...]`
  AND `depends_on: [B-0409, B-0410, ...]` — strongest references
- B-0118 has body-text mentions only (editable in this PR)
- Wallet-immune row has no incoming refs from other rows
  (composes_with B-0294/B-0321 point FROM the wallet row, not TO it)

→ Keep peer-call B-0409. Renumber:

  amara B-0409 → B-0459 (completes the amara series renumber
    started in PR #3069: B-0410 → B-0457, B-0411 → B-0458, and
    now B-0409 → B-0459)
  wallet-immune-system B-0409 → B-0460

## Chain remap

PR #3069 left B-0457's `depends_on: [B-0409]` pointing at the
soon-to-be-renumbered amara B-0409. This PR remaps it:

  B-0457.depends_on: [B-0409] → [B-0459]
  B-0457.composes_with: ..., B-0409, ... → ..., B-0459, ...

Plus B-0118 parent body §Decomposition updated:

  "B-0409 — Amara persona bootstrap definition" →
  "B-0459 (renumbered from B-0409) — Amara persona bootstrap definition"

`docs/BACKLOG.md` regenerated.

## Empirical effect (CASCADE COMPLETE)

```
$ bun tools/bg/audit-duplicate-row-ids.ts
audit-duplicate-row-ids: 561 rows with id field, no duplicate IDs
```

**Down from 12 duplicate-ID groups at session start to 0 on main.**

B-0451 cleanup progress: 11/12 → **12/12** (sweep complete).

## Session-arc cascade rounds

Round 1: B-0444 P1+P2 (PR #3053) — 12 → 11 groups
Round 2: B-0068.1 (PR #3057) — 11 → 10 groups
Round 3: B-0090.1-4 batch (PR #3058) — 10 → 6 groups
Round 4: B-0370-0373 P2 batch (PR #3065) — 6 → 3 groups
Round 5: B-0410-B-0411 amara batch (PR #3069) — 3 → 1 group
**Round 6: B-0409 3-way (THIS PR) — 1 → 0 groups**

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* shard(tick): 0223Z — B-0451 substrate-hygiene cascade COMPLETE (12 → 0 groups)

Records: PR #3069 merged (ed9284d). Cross-PR sequencing constraint
cleared. Executed the final B-0409 3-way cleanup in PR #3073.

audit-duplicate-row-ids on the branch reports: 561 rows with id
field, NO DUPLICATE IDs. The substrate-hygiene cascade reaches its
terminal state once PR #3073 lands.

Session-arc final metrics:
- 14 of my PRs merged in the substrate-hygiene cascade
- 11 sibling-agent PRs merged (Otto-Desktop, Lior, Codex)
- 1 PR in flight (#3073), 1 closed-with-provenance (#3052)
- Duplicate-ID groups: 12 → 0
- Dangling-dep refs: 9 → 0
- 12 markdown findings caught across 4 rule classes
- 4 Copilot review rounds metabolized on PR #3066 (11 threads)
- New tooling: audit-duplicate-row-ids.ts
- New durable substrate: procedure memo + B-0451 + B-0456

The work + procedure are durable; future-Otto can pick up B-0456
mechanization or any new findings via the canonical reference.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(backlog): bump renumber to B-0462/B-0463 (avoid PR #3070's B-0459-B-0461 reservation) + fix B-0457 body refs

Three issues addressed in one commit:

1. **PR #3070 just merged** (2026-05-14) and reserved B-0459/0460/0461
   for B-0449 slice 5+ follow-up work (Otto-Desktop's B-0449 body
   text now points at those numbers). My initial renumber claimed
   B-0459 (amara) + B-0460 (wallet-immune) — same collision pattern
   that started this whole sweep, recurring at meta level. Bumped
   to next-available: B-0462 (amara) + B-0463 (wallet-immune).

2. **Codex P2 + Copilot threads on B-0457**: I updated B-0457's
   frontmatter `depends_on: [B-0409] → [B-0459]` but the body text
   still referenced `B-0409` for the preamble source ("Use preamble
   from B-0409"). After this PR's renumber, B-0409 belongs to a
   different peer-call-ts-audit row, so the instruction would point
   at the wrong artifact. Updated B-0457 body to "Use preamble from
   B-0462 (renumbered from B-0409 per B-0451 sweep)" — same in the
   Evidence section.

3. **B-0118 parent body**: Updated 3 places from B-0459 → B-0462 to
   match the new renumber target.

## Final state

```
$ bun tools/bg/audit-duplicate-row-ids.ts
audit-duplicate-row-ids: 561 rows with id field, no duplicate IDs
```

The cascade still terminates at zero collisions; just with B-0462
+ B-0463 instead of B-0459 + B-0460.

## Substrate-honest meta-observation

Otto-Desktop's PR #3070 + my PR #3073 ran in parallel and BOTH
reached for the same next-free range (B-0459-0461). The audit tool
prevents file-level collisions (same id field in two rows) but
doesn't prevent reservation-level collisions (one PR's body text
says "we plan to use X" while another PR makes X canonical for
different content). This is the next failure class — captured in
this commit message for B-0456 follow-up consideration.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* shard(tick): 0238Z — caught parallel-renumber-collision with PR #3070; bumped to B-0462/0463

Records: PR #3070 (Otto-Desktop's B-0449 slice-5 reservation
renumber) merged, reserving B-0459/0460/0461. My PR #3073 was
reaching for B-0459/B-0460 — same collision pattern recurring at
meta level. Bumped to B-0462/B-0463.

Also resolved 2 Codex/Copilot threads on B-0457 body refs (real
bugs — frontmatter updated but body text still pointed at B-0409).

Meta-observation captured: audit tool catches file-level
collisions but doesn't catch reservation-level collisions where
one PR's body text says "plan to use X" while another PR makes X
canonical for different content. Next failure class for B-0456
follow-up consideration.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(shard): 0223Z — annotate superseded IDs (Copilot+Codex round-1 consistency catch)

Three Copilot/Codex threads converged on the same finding: the 0223Z
tick shard described the renumber as B-0459/B-0460 (the initial
plan) but the PR's final renumber bumped to B-0462/B-0463 (per
0238Z's catch of PR #3070's reservation collision). Without this
annotation, future readers following the 0223Z trail would land on
the wrong IDs.

Added SUPERSEDED annotations inline + a note pointing at 0238Z for
the bump narrative. The PR body has also been updated to reflect
the final IDs.

Cumulative threads resolved across this PR: 3 (Copilot round-1).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* shard(tick): 0303Z — PR #3073 round-1 review: 3 cross-shard consistency findings

Records: Copilot/Codex caught 3 consistency findings on PR #3073.
Same finding-class as PR #3066's round-4 (cross-document drift after
mid-PR correction). Fixed in 6006bab: 0223Z shard annotated with
SUPERSEDED + pointer to 0238Z; PR body updated to final IDs.

This shard was pre-validated by check-md032-blanks-around-lists.ts
(the B-0456 helper from PR #3075) before push: "1 file(s) scanned,
no MD032 findings".

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants