Skip to content

archive: preserve PR 1763 review output#1764

Merged
AceHack merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claim/archive-pr-1763-review-substrate
May 7, 2026
Merged

archive: preserve PR 1763 review output#1764
AceHack merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claim/archive-pr-1763-review-substrate

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 7, 2026

Summary

Checks

  • npx markdownlint-cli2 docs/history/pr-reviews/PR-1763-archive-preserve-pr-1762-review-output.md
  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD

Notes

PR #1763 had no review threads; this routes the workflow-generated archive through PR review because direct pushes to main are guarded by repository rules.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 7, 2026 02:16
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 7, 2026 02:16
@AceHack AceHack merged commit 38461ab into main May 7, 2026
24 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the claim/archive-pr-1763-review-substrate branch May 7, 2026 02:17
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Preserves the workflow-generated, deterministic PR-review archive for PR #1763 and registers it in the PR archive manifest, keeping the repository’s audit trail complete and reproducible.

Changes:

  • Adds the PR #1763 review archive markdown under docs/history/pr-reviews/.
  • Appends the PR #1763 entry to docs/github/prs/manifest.jsonl with the merge commit SHA and fetched timestamp.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
docs/history/pr-reviews/PR-1763-archive-preserve-pr-1762-review-output.md Adds the deterministic archive record for PR #1763 (metadata + outcome; no threads).
docs/github/prs/manifest.jsonl Adds the JSONL manifest entry pointing to the new PR #1763 archive and its merge commit SHA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants