hygiene(tick-history): 2026-05-03T11:30Z — .sh cleanup loop closed (#1382) + math-proofs assessment opened (#1383)

docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/03/1130Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+| 2026-05-03T11:30:16Z | opus-4-7 / autonomous-loop continuation | 3bd5ad8 | **.sh→.ts cleanup loop CLOSED (#1382 merged removing 5 deferred .sh files); honest math-proofs assessment doc opened (#1383) on the human maintainer 2026-05-03 ask.** Step 0a fired (gap 14 min, threshold 15). Real-work tick chain: (1) #1382 merged — `audit-memory-index-duplicates.sh` + `audit-memory-references.sh` + `check-archive-header-section33.sh` + `check-no-conflict-markers.sh` + `check-tick-history-order.sh` removed; 7 active substrate surfaces updated (LOST-FILES-LOCATIONS.md survey command + RESUME.md Bucket D listing + 4 sibling-tool comments + baseline file). Closes the loop the human maintainer opened in #1371 (*"we should clean up .sh and any .sh where we have the .ts I thought we were fully converted"*); (2) Pivot to honest math-proofs assessment per the human maintainer 2026-05-03 framing (*"we have math proofs (some good quality some back, we need an honest assesment of that, but the core DBSP i've have verified like 100times now, we are beyond cutting edge and mathecial formally verivied just not peer reviowed"*). PR #1383 opens `docs/research/2026-05-03-math-proofs-honest-assessment.md` — synthesis doc grading every formal-verification artifact A/B/C against peer-review readiness; cross-links verification-registry + proof-tool-coverage + verification-drift-audit-2026-04-19 + chain-rule-proof-log; outstanding-work matrix maps each grade upgrade to effort + priority. **A-grade (peer-review citable today, 4 clusters)**: DBSP Prop 3.2 (Lean/Mathlib), Dop_LTI_commute (Thm 3.3 corollary, Lean), 8 Z3 algebra axioms, 5 TLA+ specs in CI. **B-grade (machine-checkable, not in CI)**: 4 deferred TLA+ specs, Alloy, Stryker config, Semgrep. **C-grade (sketch / aspirational)**: 4 TLA+ specs without .cfg, code paths without models, FsCheck-property gaps, `chain_rule_poly` research item. **P0 outstanding work**: Lean lake-build CI job (1 day), Stryker CI (1 day), registry rows for 5 in-CI TLA+ specs (1 day), peer-review email draft (2 hours). (3) Earlier in this tick chain — Aaron's framing-correction *"changing the engine while driving sounds like edge runner tertitory"* + *"we are beyond cutting edge and mathecial formally verivied just not peer reviowed"* corrected my classical-PM defer-the-dogfooding framing. The honest assessment doc IS the prerequisite for the peer-review path: external reviewers need a grade map. **CADENCE-TRACK**: AutoDream still overdue (last 2026-04-23, ~10 days); cadence-rule prohibits same-session run on fresh memories; defer next-session unchanged. | #1382 + #1383 (auto-merge armed); .sh→.ts loop closed; math-proofs assessment substrate landed | This tick teaches **honest-assessment-as-peer-review-prerequisite**: an external reviewer cannot accept "we have proofs" — they need a grade map showing which artifacts are A/B/C, which run in CI, which have registry rows, which have drift-audit history. The synthesis doc at `docs/research/2026-05-03-math-proofs-honest-assessment.md` is what that map looks like for Zeta. The maintainer's claim "beyond cutting edge, formally verified just not peer-reviewed" is supportable AT A-GRADE for chain-rule + Z-set axioms + 5 TLA+ specs. The gap is administrative (peer-review email + lake-build CI), not technical. Future-Otto: when a maintainer asks for "honest assessment", produce a synthesis doc that grades artifacts and maps grade-upgrades to effort — not a re-verification sweep. The verification-drift-auditor skill handles the per-artifact deep audit on cadence; the synthesis doc serves the publishability question. |