Skip to content

hygiene(tick-history): 2026-05-03T11:10Z — gate.yml 3-job sh→ts conversion (#1380) + #1378 reviewer fix#1381

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hygiene/tick-1110Z-gate-conversion
May 3, 2026
Merged

hygiene(tick-history): 2026-05-03T11:10Z — gate.yml 3-job sh→ts conversion (#1380) + #1378 reviewer fix#1381
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hygiene/tick-1110Z-gate-conversion

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 3, 2026

Summary

Test plan

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…rsion (#1380) + #1378 reviewer fix

Final risk-strat tier of the .sh→.ts CI cleanup. PR #1380 opens with
all 3 gate.yml lint jobs (check-tick-history-order,
check-no-conflict-markers, check-archive-header-section33) converted
in one bounded PR — rationale: independent parallel jobs, parity
verified locally, mitigates 3-PR round-trip cost.

PR #1378 reviewer thread (FACTORY-HYGIENE.md row 59) addressed in
commit 3e0342c on that branch. Thread resolved via GraphQL.

Discipline lesson: pre-flight surface scan as parity-debt prevention.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 3, 2026 11:11
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 3, 2026 11:11
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds the tick-history shard for 2026-05-03T11:10:56Z, capturing the autonomous-loop “real-work” tick that documents the gate.yml lint-job .sh → .ts conversion PR (#1380) and the follow-up resolution of a reviewer-thread from #1378.

Changes:

  • Adds a new tick-history shard entry under the standard per-tick shard path for 2026/05/03/1110Z.
  • Records the state transition narrative for PR #1380 opening plus the #1378 reviewer-thread resolution and local parity verification notes.

@AceHack AceHack merged commit 09776e0 into main May 3, 2026
25 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the hygiene/tick-1110Z-gate-conversion branch May 3, 2026 11:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants