Skip to content

fix(MEMORY.md): rewrite fragment phrasing in consent-driven UX entry (#1292 follow-up) #1294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2026
Merged

fix(MEMORY.md): rewrite fragment phrasing in consent-driven UX entry (#1292 follow-up) #1294

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion memory/MEMORY.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
**📌 Fast path: read `CURRENT-aaron.md` and `CURRENT-amara.md` first.** <!-- paired-edit: PR #690 scheduled-workflow-null-result-hygiene-scan tier-1 promotion 2026-04-28 --> These per-maintainer distillations show what's currently in force. Raw memories below are the history; CURRENT files are the projection. (`CURRENT-aaron.md` refreshed 2026-04-28 with sections 26-30 — speculation rule + EVIDENCE-BASED labeling + JVM preference + dependency honesty + threading lineage Albahari/Toub/Fowler + TypeScript/Bun-default discipline.)

- [**Edge-defining work is not speculation — framing correction (Aaron 2026-05-03)**](feedback_edge_defining_work_not_speculation_framing_correction_aaron_2026_05_03.md) — Calibration + hypothesis-formation + frontier-recognition IS the job, not idle-fallback. Reserve "speculation" for the narrow case; framing affects confidence, which affects substrate quality.
- [**Consent-driven UX + architect-vs-UX class inference failure (Aaron 2026-05-03)**](feedback_consent_driven_ux_trend_aaron_architect_plus_ux_rare_combination_calibration_class_finding_2026_05_03.md) — Zeta's UX philosophy across consumer/contributor/agent/multi-harness; for agents = full observability of metrics + derivations (anti-black-box-eval). Architect-models-are-UX-weak is calibration-class.
- [**Consent-driven UX + architect-vs-UX class inference failure (Aaron 2026-05-03)**](feedback_consent_driven_ux_trend_aaron_architect_plus_ux_rare_combination_calibration_class_finding_2026_05_03.md) — Zeta's UX philosophy; for agents = full observability of metrics + derivations (anti-black-box-eval). Architect-trained models are UX-weak — a calibration-class inference failure.
Comment thread
AceHack marked this conversation as resolved.
- [**Same-tick-update-recursion — substrate cascade across projection layers (Otto 2026-05-03)**](feedback_same_tick_update_recursion_substrate_cascade_otto_2026_05_03.md) — When new substrate lands, every projection layer (CURRENT/MEMORY/AGENTS/CLAUDE/skills/notebooks/ticks) must update same-tick. Cascade IS the discipline; partial-cascade IS the failure mode.
- [**`architectural-intent-guesses/` — Otto's calibration data directory**](architectural-intent-guesses/README.md) — In-the-moment guesses + ground-truth deltas. Series: #001 B-0173 (48%) + #002 B-0172 (65%). Patterns: principle-strong + specific-weak (context-dependent); over-inference of motivations.
- [**Guess-then-verify architectural-intent calibration protocol (Aaron 2026-05-03)**](feedback_guess_then_verify_architectural_intent_calibration_protocol_aaron_2026_05_03.md) — Save inference BEFORE researching; record calibration delta after. Two modes: in-the-moment (Otto-only; frontier-ability) + retroactive (other-models; cross-model benchmarking).
Expand Down
Loading