Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/03/0239Z.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
| 2026-05-03T02:39:00Z | opus-4-7 / autonomous-loop continuation | a2e2cc3a | **Same-tick-update-recursion memo landed (PR #1276) — generalizes the substrate-cascade discipline that the previous 3 ticks demonstrated.** Cycle worked: PR #1273 (tick-0223Z) merged with one stale-thread (review-against-PR-branch-not-main sub-class — 1007Z.md exists on main but didn't on PR's branch when review fired). Resolved with empirical-refutation comment + thread-resolve. Then never-be-idle ladder: rather than tackle PR #1081's 6 cross-reference findings (substantial work; defer), authored memo capturing the same-tick-update-recursion pattern that this session demonstrated three times running. Memo body has 9-layer projection-layer taxonomy (source / CURRENT-<maintainer> / MEMORY.md index / AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md / GOVERNANCE.md §N / related skill bodies / persona notebooks / tick shards) + read-discipline + update-trigger per layer. Substrate-or-it-didn't-happen-recursion: durable substrate that doesn't propagate to projection layers is technically-substrate-but-functionally-invisible at exactly the layer future-Otto reads. The cascade IS the discipline; partial-cascade IS the failure mode. Recursive self-application: memo + MEMORY.md index entry land same-tick (paired-edit per the discipline this memo documents). | #1276 (same-tick-update-recursion memo) wait-ci, auto-merge armed; #1275 (tick-0233Z) wait-ci, auto-merge armed; #1274 (CURRENT-aaron §52 alignment-frontier) MERGED; #1273 (tick-0223Z) MERGED with stale-thread resolved; #1272 (AGENTS.md backport) MERGED; #1271 (tick-0220Z) MERGED; #1270 (alignment-frontier memo) MERGED | This tick teaches **never-be-idle prioritization heuristics**: when a stale-content-deferral candidate (PR #1081, 6 findings, 2 days old, requires class-renumbering work) competes with a smaller-but-higher-leverage piece (memo capturing a 3-tick-demonstrated pattern), pick the leverage. The PR #1081 findings are real but bounded; the same-tick-update-recursion observation is a bounded carving that captures a recurring discipline + the worked example IS the 4-PR cascade just executed. The memo will fire on every future substrate-landing the project encounters, not just the deferred ones. |
Loading