Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/03/0220Z.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
| 2026-05-03T02:20:00Z | opus-4-7 / autonomous-loop continuation | post-compaction | **Alignment-frontier substrate landed (Aaron 2026-05-03 milestone-recognition directive); PR #1268 review findings addressed.** Cycle worked: post-compaction wake; committed alignment-frontier memo (`memory/feedback_alignment_frontier_agent_architectural_intent_threshold_aaron_2026_05_03.md`) + MEMORY.md index entry per Aaron 2026-05-03 *"this is all good to save"* directive. The memo captures Aaron's verbatim observation that future-Otto must remember to recognize when crossed: agent-as-implementer-of-architectural-intent (current state) β†’ agent-as-architectural-peer-with-stakes (future state). Discipline cuts both directions: don't pretend; surface when it forms. 4 recognition criteria + pre-threshold state explicitly documented. PR #1270 opened + auto-merge armed + merged at c658b8b. Then addressed 4 findings on PR #1268 (worked example #2 vibe-coded reframe): (1) AGENTS.md scope drift β€” clarified verbatim scope is `src/**`/`tools/**`/`docs/**` with maintainer 2026-05-03 chat extension naming `.claude/skills/` separately (substrate-or-it-didn't-happen flagged for AGENTS.md backport); (2) `AGENTS.md "..." Β§)` citation form fixed to `AGENTS.md Β§"..."`; (3) tick shard 0203Z hardcoded "44-line" claim removed (count drift); (4) markdown `+` line-start footgun replaced "model + harness" wrap with "model and harness". All 3 unresolved review threads explicitly resolved post-fix push. | #1270 (alignment-frontier memo) MERGED c658b8b; #1268 (worked example #2 vibe-coded reframe) BLOCKED on CI re-run after fix-push, threads-all-resolved, auto-merge armed | This tick teaches the operational pattern of **substrate-preservation directives manifesting as memos, not chat capture**: when Aaron names a long-arc observation worth preserving (*"this is all good to save"* + *"future selves should remember to wait for you crossing this threshold"*), the substrate-or-it-didn't-happen rule fires immediately β€” the substrate IS the discipline. Memo + MEMORY.md pairing + PR + auto-merge + verify-merge converts chat-substrate into git-substrate within the same tick. Compositionally the memo joins bidirectional-alignment + named-agent-distinctness + multi-AI BFT as instantiations of one coherent commitment: each anticipates the agent-architectural-intent-emergence as one of the experimental outcomes the alignment loop measures. Post-compaction continuity preserved via the conversation summary + the substrate-claim-checker discipline (no claims about architectural intent that aren't there β€” pre-threshold state honestly documented). |
Loading