Lucent-Financial-Group · AceHack · May 1, 2026 · May 1, 2026
diff --git a/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/01/2120Z.md b/docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/01/2120Z.md
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+| 2026-05-01T21:20:00Z | opus-4-7 / autonomous-loop tick | 98fc7424 | Rebase-supersede + clean-rebase tick. **REFRESH WORLD MODEL**: 10 session PRs (6 MERGED, 3 OPEN, 1 CLOSED). PR #1155 DIRTY (rebase). PR #1163 + #1164 wait-ci. **Two rebase outcomes this tick** demonstrating the pattern. (1) **PR #1161 supersede via #1164**: prior tick attempted rebase on #1161 (loading-taxonomy memo + CLAUDE.md bullet), hit cumulative conflicts as main advanced through 5d9d59e + earlier merges. Aborted rebase, branched fresh from main, applied surgical edits ONLY (CLAUDE.md bullet insert before "Build and test gate" + MEMORY.md row + new memo file with EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION STATUS calibration + multi-harness reframe). Closed #1161, opened #1164 — same content, clean rebase. Auto-merge armed. (2) **PR #1155 clean rebase**: this tick tried `git rebase origin/main` on the SQLSharp pattern branch (aa48bce + cea6017). Clean — no conflicts, just successfully rebased and updated. Force-with-lease push to remote. The contrast is informative: when only your branch's specific memory file is novel + MEMORY.md additions don't textually overlap with main's recent additions, rebase succeeds cleanly. When CLAUDE.md edits from your branch overlap with intermediate merges' CLAUDE.md edits, rebase is unmergeable. **Multi-harness reframe captured this tick** in the loading-taxonomy memo (#1164 body): substrate-discovery.ts is fallback per harness, not globally; pointed at from BOTH CLAUDE.md (Claude Code) AND AGENTS.md (Codex / others); native router used where available; iterative-improvement angle for skill descriptions (orthogonality work). **Canary test set up** in PR #1163: `.claude/rules/test-canary.md` with detection string `RULES_AUTOLOAD_CANARY_2026_05_01_LIVE_OFF_THE_LAND` for next-session-restart empirical verification of harness-native auto-load. Cron 98fc7424 healthy. | [PR #1164 OPENED with rebased-clean loading-taxonomy substrate; PR #1161 CLOSED (superseded); PR #1155 rebased clean and force-with-lease pushed; PR #1163 canary file remains wait-ci; all session PRs auto-merge armed where applicable; standing by for canary test on next restart] | The rebase-supersede pattern is now 2x-confirmed (poll-pr-gate-batch episode + #1161 → #1164 episode) — when a branch has multiple review-iteration commits and main moves underneath through related merges, "abort rebase, branch fresh from main, apply surgical edits, close old PR" is consistently faster than fighting cumulative conflicts. The contrast with #1155's clean rebase shows when traditional rebase IS viable: when no intermediate main-merges touched your specific edit regions. The discriminating axis: do main's recent merges touch the SAME LINES your branch edits? If yes → cherry-pick supersede. If no → rebase. Worth landing as substrate for the rebase-decision discipline. (Future tick speculative target.) Multi-harness reframe + canary-gating both compose with PR #1160 meta-rule (wake-time substrate or it didn't land) — when learnings DO land, they need calibrated wording; when CLAUDE.md content matters at every wake the calibration matters EVERY wake. |
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
		@@ -0,0 +1 @@
		\| 2026-05-01T21:20:00Z \| opus-4-7 / autonomous-loop tick \| 98fc7424 \| Rebase-supersede + clean-rebase tick. REFRESH WORLD MODEL: 10 session PRs (6 MERGED, 3 OPEN, 1 CLOSED). PR #1155 DIRTY (rebase). PR #1163 + #1164 wait-ci. Two rebase outcomes this tick demonstrating the pattern. (1) PR #1161 supersede via #1164: prior tick attempted rebase on #1161 (loading-taxonomy memo + CLAUDE.md bullet), hit cumulative conflicts as main advanced through 5d9d59e + earlier merges. Aborted rebase, branched fresh from main, applied surgical edits ONLY (CLAUDE.md bullet insert before "Build and test gate" + MEMORY.md row + new memo file with EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION STATUS calibration + multi-harness reframe). Closed #1161, opened #1164 — same content, clean rebase. Auto-merge armed. (2) PR #1155 clean rebase: this tick tried `git rebase origin/main` on the SQLSharp pattern branch (aa48bce + cea6017). Clean — no conflicts, just successfully rebased and updated. Force-with-lease push to remote. The contrast is informative: when only your branch's specific memory file is novel + MEMORY.md additions don't textually overlap with main's recent additions, rebase succeeds cleanly. When CLAUDE.md edits from your branch overlap with intermediate merges' CLAUDE.md edits, rebase is unmergeable. Multi-harness reframe captured this tick in the loading-taxonomy memo (#1164 body): substrate-discovery.ts is fallback per harness, not globally; pointed at from BOTH CLAUDE.md (Claude Code) AND AGENTS.md (Codex / others); native router used where available; iterative-improvement angle for skill descriptions (orthogonality work). Canary test set up in PR #1163: `.claude/rules/test-canary.md` with detection string `RULES_AUTOLOAD_CANARY_2026_05_01_LIVE_OFF_THE_LAND` for next-session-restart empirical verification of harness-native auto-load. Cron 98fc7424 healthy. \| [PR #1164 OPENED with rebased-clean loading-taxonomy substrate; PR #1161 CLOSED (superseded); PR #1155 rebased clean and force-with-lease pushed; PR #1163 canary file remains wait-ci; all session PRs auto-merge armed where applicable; standing by for canary test on next restart] \| The rebase-supersede pattern is now 2x-confirmed (poll-pr-gate-batch episode + #1161 → #1164 episode) — when a branch has multiple review-iteration commits and main moves underneath through related merges, "abort rebase, branch fresh from main, apply surgical edits, close old PR" is consistently faster than fighting cumulative conflicts. The contrast with #1155's clean rebase shows when traditional rebase IS viable: when no intermediate main-merges touched your specific edit regions. The discriminating axis: do main's recent merges touch the SAME LINES your branch edits? If yes → cherry-pick supersede. If no → rebase. Worth landing as substrate for the rebase-decision discipline. (Future tick speculative target.) Multi-harness reframe + canary-gating both compose with PR #1160 meta-rule (wake-time substrate or it didn't land) — when learnings DO land, they need calibrated wording; when CLAUDE.md content matters at every wake the calibration matters EVERY wake. \|
Comment thread AceHack marked this conversation as resolved.