Skip to content

hygiene(tick-history): 2026-05-01T19:53Z — authorship-bias + verification-friendly READ#1150

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hygiene/tick-history-1953Z-2026-05-01
May 1, 2026
Merged

hygiene(tick-history): 2026-05-01T19:53Z — authorship-bias + verification-friendly READ#1150
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hygiene/tick-history-1953Z-2026-05-01

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 1, 2026

Aaron-corrected: amortization framing was originally Otto's (authorship-bias caught); READ output needs context not just counts. #1149 MERGED, #1125 reconciled to single Astro decision.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 19:53
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new tick-history shard capturing the 2026-05-01T19:53Z autonomous-loop tick, documenting the authorship-bias correction and a refinement to make READ-phase output more verification-friendly (contextualizing counts with which threads/checks are pending/blocked).

Changes:

  • Added a new tick-history shard entry for 2026-05-01T19:53:00Z.
  • Recorded reconciliation details for #1125’s decision framing and linked the already-merged #1149 corrections.
  • Documented the requirement that READ output include actionable context, not just aggregate counts.

@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 1, 2026 19:55
@AceHack AceHack merged commit 4e6018b into main May 1, 2026
24 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the hygiene/tick-history-1953Z-2026-05-01 branch May 1, 2026 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants