hygiene(tick-history): 2026-05-01T18:48Z — post-#1131 cascade rebase tick

docs/hygiene-history/ticks/2026/05/01/1848Z.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+| 2026-05-01T18:48:00Z | opus-4-7 / autonomous-loop tick | 98fc7424 | Post-#1131-merge cascade tick. Three branches DIRTY (rebase needed) post #1131 merge moving main forward. Rebased + drained: (1) **#1133 (B-0158)** — 6 Copilot threads on terminology drift (carved-statements vs carved-sentences) + xref-not-yet-merged warnings. Rebased onto main; replaced "Carved-statements-only" with "Carved-sentences-only" + replaced PR-number references with stable framing ("the carved-sentences architectural-claim cluster (in-flight integration)"); 6 threads resolved. (2) **#1132 (otto-buddy)** — rebased onto main; 1 CI failure on `submit-nuget` (Automatic Dependency Submission — known transient flake; rebase auto-retries). (3) **#1130 (detect-changes)** — rebased onto main + 2 Copilot threads (description "three load-bearing patterns" drifted vs body's seven; "github" capitalization in non-verbatim text). Fixed both: description updated to seven with explicit list; "best repo on GitHub" capitalized in Otto-prose with note that Aaron's verbatim quote retains lowercase. Cron 98fc7424 healthy. | [#1133 rebased + force-pushed (4061340) + 6 threads resolved; #1132 rebased + force-pushed (12df1e9) for transient CI re-run; #1130 rebased + force-pushed (fddbc76) + 2 threads resolved + 9051192 fix-up] | The rebase-cascade pattern (one merge → all sibling PRs DIRTY → mechanical rebase wave) is the predictable cost of parallel-PR development. The detect-changes pattern in B-0157 / B-0158 / B-0155 (rulesets) cluster IS the structural mitigation — when CI workflows are per-change-class instead of monolithic, sibling PRs that touch different concerns DON'T trigger each other's CI re-runs on rebase. The trifecta is exactly what's queued (B-0153 lint suite + B-0155 ruleset split + B-0157/B-0158 .claude/rules). Aaron's parallel-PR-friendliness framing is the outcome served by the trajectory cluster. |