Skip to content

hygiene(tick-history): 2026-05-01T09:44Z — phantom-blocker triple drain#1071

Merged
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hygiene/tick-history-2026-05-01T0944Z-996-995-993-phantoms
May 1, 2026
Merged

hygiene(tick-history): 2026-05-01T09:44Z — phantom-blocker triple drain#1071
AceHack merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hygiene/tick-history-2026-05-01T0944Z-996-995-993-phantoms

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 1, 2026

Summary

3 older hygiene shards (#996, #995, #993) all unblocked this tick. Each had a distinct phantom-blocker sub-class:

Class lesson: phantom-blocker has at least 3 sub-classes, each requiring different empirical-verification command.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 09:45
@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 1, 2026 09:45
@AceHack AceHack merged commit 38d7a59 into main May 1, 2026
22 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the hygiene/tick-history-2026-05-01T0944Z-996-995-993-phantoms branch May 1, 2026 09:47
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new tick-history shard documenting a “phantom-blocker” unblock event where three older hygiene PRs (#996, #995, #993) were cleared after empirical verification.

Changes:

  • Adds 2026-05-01T09:44Z tick-history shard row under docs/hygiene-history/ticks/.
  • Captures three distinct phantom-blocker sub-classes and the corresponding verification commands used to refute them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants