Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new tick-history shard documenting a “phantom-blocker” unblock event where three older hygiene PRs (#996, #995, #993) were cleared after empirical verification.
Changes:
- Adds
2026-05-01T09:44Ztick-history shard row underdocs/hygiene-history/ticks/. - Captures three distinct phantom-blocker sub-classes and the corresponding verification commands used to refute them.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
3 older hygiene shards (#996, #995, #993) all unblocked this tick. Each had a distinct phantom-blocker sub-class:
\|flagged as unescaped)56af177cited but absent from file)Class lesson: phantom-blocker has at least 3 sub-classes, each requiring different empirical-verification command.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code