Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove lightning legacy code and references #788

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Feb 5, 2022
Merged

Conversation

SkafteNicki
Copy link
Member

@SkafteNicki SkafteNicki commented Jan 20, 2022

What does this PR do?

In #739 we (silently) decided to only support v1.3 of lightning moving forward (increased from 1.0).
This PR increases the requirement once again to v1.5 because we need to remove some deprecated metrics that was still present in `pytorch_lightning.metrics (PL<1.5).
Additionally removed some legacy code and reference to lightning.

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue? (no need for typos and docs improvements)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure to update the docs?
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@SkafteNicki SkafteNicki added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 20, 2022
@SkafteNicki SkafteNicki added this to the v0.8 milestone Jan 20, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #788 (0d8d6ae) into master (385b18e) will increase coverage by 0%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #788   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage      95%    95%           
=====================================
  Files         166    166           
  Lines        6832   6827    -5     
=====================================
+ Hits         6457   6481   +24     
+ Misses        375    346   -29     

@Borda Borda modified the milestones: v0.8, v0.7 Jan 20, 2022
@Borda Borda enabled auto-merge (squash) January 20, 2022 16:26
@mergify mergify bot added the ready label Jan 20, 2022
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready label Jan 26, 2022
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 27, 2022 20:36

Pull Request is not mergeable

torchmetrics/__about__.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/pages/lightning.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/pages/lightning.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready label Jan 31, 2022
Co-authored-by: Justus Schock <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jirka Borovec <[email protected]>
@mergify mergify bot added the ready label Feb 1, 2022
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mergify mergify bot added the ready label Feb 3, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@akihironitta akihironitta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpicking 🔨

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/governance.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/pages/implement.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Borda Borda requested a review from carmocca February 4, 2022 23:45
@Borda Borda enabled auto-merge (squash) February 4, 2022 23:49
@Borda Borda disabled auto-merge February 5, 2022 08:51
@Borda Borda merged commit b225889 into master Feb 5, 2022
@Borda Borda deleted the deprecated_lightning_code branch February 5, 2022 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Lightning ready
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants