Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Fix the rouge internal example #2599

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 13, 2024

Conversation

baskrahmer
Copy link
Collaborator

@baskrahmer baskrahmer commented Jun 17, 2024

Current example is computing ROUGE on the letters 😛 seems a bit fishy


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://torchmetrics--2599.org.readthedocs.build/en/2599/

@baskrahmer baskrahmer changed the title Fix the rouge internal example docs: Fix the rouge internal example Jun 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39%. Comparing base (7fd82d3) to head (6243380).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (7fd82d3) and HEAD (6243380). Click for more details.

HEAD has 3 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (7fd82d3) HEAD (6243380)
python3.10 5 4
Linux 13 12
torch2.2.2+cpu 2 1
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #2599     +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage      69%     39%    -30%     
========================================
  Files         314     314             
  Lines       17705   17705             
========================================
- Hits        12198    6971   -5227     
- Misses       5507   10734   +5227     

@mergify mergify bot added the ready label Jun 17, 2024
@stancld stancld enabled auto-merge (squash) July 13, 2024 09:14
@Borda Borda disabled auto-merge July 13, 2024 13:30
@Borda Borda merged commit cf76c79 into Lightning-AI:master Jul 13, 2024
63 of 65 checks passed
Borda pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
Borda pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants