-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[App] Enable to register data connections #16670
Conversation
⚡ Required checks status: All passing 🟢Groups summary🟢 pytorch_lightning: Tests workflowThese checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Azure GPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Azure HPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Azure IPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 pytorch_lightning: Docs
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 lightning_fabric: CPU workflow
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 lightning_fabric: Azure GPU
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 lightning_app: Tests workflow
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 lightning_app: Examples
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 lightning_app: Azure
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 lightning_app: Docs
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 mypy
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 installThese checks are required after the changes to 🟢 link-check
These checks are required after the changes to Thank you for your contribution! 💜
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It feels a bit weird to me that lightning connect data
and lightning connect app
both exist in the same group as they are about two different kinds of connection. So lightning connect app
doesn't feel right, it would be more like lightning connect to app
- maybe lightning connect
should be renamed entirely to lightning attach
or something?
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #16670 +/- ##
=======================================
- Coverage 81% 81% -0%
=======================================
Files 445 436 -9
Lines 32500 32423 -77
=======================================
- Hits 26431 26352 -79
- Misses 6069 6071 +2 |
I agree. Let's re-align the CLI experience soon before Trainer 2.0. So we can improve on the wordings and consistency. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @ethanwharris
Co-authored-by: thomas <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 88e089e)
Co-authored-by: thomas <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 88e089e)
Co-authored-by: thomas <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 88e089e)
Co-authored-by: thomas <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 88e089e)
What does this PR do?
This PR refactors connect to add sub ressources:
NB: Need to merge some platforms stuffs for the tests to pass.
Fixes #<issue_number>
Before submitting
PR review
Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing, make sure you have read the review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:
Reviewer checklist
cc @Borda