Skip to content

Conversation

stevennevins
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@stevennevins stevennevins self-assigned this Apr 29, 2024
Comment on lines 804 to 994
cheats.assume(blockGap < 100);
numRegistrants = bound(numRegistrants, 1, 100);
blockGap = bound(blockGap, 0, 10);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any reason for switching the upper bound here to 10 from 100?
seems fine either way tho

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice catch that was a typo

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ChaoticWalrus ChaoticWalrus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine. I commented on the two actual changes I see -- everything else is formatting.

@stevennevins stevennevins merged commit 1703d25 into dev Apr 29, 2024
@stevennevins stevennevins deleted the fix/bound-inputs branch April 29, 2024 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants