Tupek/contact adjoint #1229
Open
Tupek/contact adjoint #1229
+370
−57
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
/style |
tupek2
force-pushed
the
tupek/contact_adjoint
branch
from
4bb9c5a
to
bad482e
Compare
tupek2
force-pushed
the
tupek/contact_adjoint
branch
from
2e52fda
to
5f42eaf
Compare
|
/style |
tupek2
force-pushed
the
tupek/contact_adjoint
branch
2 times, most recently
from
eb82e53
to
223474b
Compare
|
/style |
1 similar comment
|
/style |
samuelpmishLLNL
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2024
Delete copy
…nt states instead of generic mfem vectors.
tupek2
force-pushed
the
tupek/contact_adjoint
branch
from
f4b7a86
to
98e918e
Compare
|
/style |
1 similar comment
|
/style |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Abstract solid mechanics a bit to allow for contact jacobian corrections in the adjoint calculations. Gradient test is not super accurate, maybe ~20% off. Hopefully the analytic contact jacobians can fix this, or there is still some error in our adjoint calculations here?