Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove kind port mappings #421

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

remove kind port mappings #421

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

eguzki
Copy link
Contributor

@eguzki eguzki commented Feb 14, 2024

What

Port mappings defined for kind cluster are no longer needed. Hence, removed.

After adding metallb and LoadBalancer service types for the gateways, the gateways get an IP that is not the same as the IP address of the control plane docker container. Thus, port mapping does not work.

@eguzki eguzki requested a review from a team as a code owner February 14, 2024 15:09
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #421 (df64dba) into main (a825617) will decrease coverage by 0.44%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #421      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.93%   65.49%   -0.44%     
==========================================
  Files          38       38              
  Lines        3901     3901              
==========================================
- Hits         2572     2555      -17     
- Misses       1138     1154      +16     
- Partials      191      192       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 69.91% <ø> (-0.84%) ⬇️
unit 60.69% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
api/v1beta1 (u) ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg/common (u) 78.59% <ø> (ø)
pkg/istio (u) 37.11% <ø> (ø)
pkg/log (u) 31.81% <ø> (ø)
pkg/reconcilers (u) 33.44% <ø> (ø)
pkg/rlptools (u) 56.46% <ø> (ø)
controllers (i) 69.91% <ø> (-0.84%) ⬇️

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@didierofrivia didierofrivia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💣

Copy link
Member

@adam-cattermole adam-cattermole left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, lgtm!

@eguzki eguzki merged commit 8bf2d55 into main Feb 14, 2024
22 checks passed
@eguzki eguzki deleted the remove-unused-config branch February 14, 2024 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants