-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
* feat: apply RLP gateway overrides * feat: RLP CEL implicit default and override mutual exclusivity * refactor: use DAG for applying RLP overrides * refactor: RLP CEL for override - only allowed for gateways and mutually exclusive with defaults * docs: RLP overrides * feat: rlp enforced condition * refactor: event handler for limitador status changes only * refactor: overridden policy map * refactor: override logic and integration tests * refactor: overridden to affected policy map * tests: add testing enforced condition to other integration tests * fix: wasm plugin config not accounting for limit overrides * tests: AuthPolicy enforced condition message * fix: invalid reason not deleting second ns after test & fix missing comments
- Loading branch information
Showing
27 changed files
with
2,150 additions
and
321 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.