We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In consistency with Kotlin/KEEP#45
I still believe that we'd rather have an annotation for suppressing this but we gotta start with something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also it makes sense to support internal attribute.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Introduce visibilityModifier to the TopLevelModel
760ba16
so far everywhere VisibilityModifier.DEFAULT is passed. Those are preparations for supporting #124
idl always translated in accordance with KEEP-45
6e95b47
This contributes to #124 Next step would be to customize this via command-line flag
How is it going now? I'm very happy if dukat can support the explicit api mode.
No branches or pull requests
In consistency with Kotlin/KEEP#45
I still believe that we'd rather have an annotation for suppressing this but we gotta start with something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: