fix(ci): provision Trunk workflow lint dependencies - #548
Conversation
🤖 CodeAnt AI — Review Status
|
Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing. Share on X · |
L17 Latency Budget ReportChecked against: budgets/rest-endpoints.yaml. |
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
codeant-ai
Bot
added
the
size:S
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 25 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Note
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Workflow tool installation and verification .github/workflows/trunk-check.yml |
The workflow installs jq and yamllint, downloads actionlint, adds it to PATH, and verifies all three tools. |
Action version comment separation .github/workflows/trunk-check.yml |
The workflow moves checkout and Trunk cache-version annotations to separate comments. |
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
- KooshaPari/OmniRoute#502: Both changes update Trunk action references and pinning comments.
- KooshaPari/OmniRoute#542: Both changes update
actionlintsetup in the Trunk workflow.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title clearly and concisely describes the primary CI workflow change. |
| Description check | ✅ Passed | The description explains the workflow changes and lists relevant validation commands, but it omits several template sections. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. |
| Linked Issues check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
- Create stacked PR
- Commit on current branch
📝 Generate docstrings
- Create stacked PR
- Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
- Create PR with unit tests
- Commit unit tests in branch
fix/trunk-jq-yamllint-main-20260808
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
L17 Latency Regression ReportThreshold: 10% p99 regression. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/trunk-check.yml:
- Around line 42-51: Update the actionlint installation block around
actionlint_host/actionlint_url to fetch download-actionlint.bash from a full
immutable commit, pass an explicit actionlint release version instead of latest,
and verify the downloaded release artifact’s SHA256 checksum before extraction
or use. Preserve the existing installation path and GitHub PATH setup, and fail
the workflow on checksum mismatch.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0f64b8fb-d585-407e-8a9f-19e2929a7bfd
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/trunk-check.yml
Code Review SummaryStatus: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (6 files)
Previous Review Summaries (2 snapshots, latest commit 7d939ce)Current summary above is authoritative. Previous snapshots are kept for context only. Previous review (commit 7d939ce)Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (2 files)
Previous review (commit 25f62bc)Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (4 files)
Reviewed by step-3.7-flash · Input: 104.7K · Output: 13.9K · Cached: 890.2K |
|
❌ The last analysis has failed. |
User description
Summary
jqandyamllintbefore the Trunk action runsGITHUB_PATHValidation
ruby -e 'require "yaml"; YAML.load_file(".github/workflows/trunk-check.yml")'\n-yamllint .github/workflows/trunk-check.yml(two repository-policy warnings only)\n-actionlint .github/workflows/trunk-check.yml\n-git diff --check\n\nSupersedes the stale/conflicting CI provisioning work in fix(ci): provision jq and actionlint for trunk #544; no force-push or history rewrite.CodeAnt-AI Description
Provision all dependencies required for workflow lint checks
What Changed
jqandyamllintbefore Trunk runsactionlintand verifies all three linting tools are availableImpact
✅ Fewer workflow lint failures✅ Clearer CI dependency errors✅ Reliable YAML and GitHub Actions validation💡 Usage Guide
Checking Your Pull Request
Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.
Talking to CodeAnt AI
Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:
This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.
Example
Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt
You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:
This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.
Example
Retrigger review
Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:
Check Your Repository Health
To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.
Summary by CodeRabbit