fix(ci): replace invalid mergify review team with owner user

[KooshaPari]

Replace invalid Mergify request_reviews team target and align rule with existing ownership behavior.

Changes:

• Change .mergify.yml on main from:
  • request_reviews.teams: [phenotype/core]
  • to request_reviews.users: [KooshaPari]
• Keep governance self-check guard: author != KooshaPari so owner PRs do not trigger self-review requests.

Why:

• PR wip: capture agent/migration-version-collision-fix (audit 2026-07-24..08-02) #496 reports Invalid requested teams with Team 'phenotype/core' is not part of the organization.
• This value is present only in origin/main's .mergify.yml, not in PR branch config.
• This change is minimal and local to main governance behavior with low blast radius.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.
Repo admins can enable using credits for code reviews in their settings.

[codeant-ai]

🤖 CodeAnt AI — Review Status

Status	Commit	Started (UTC)	Finished (UTC)
✅ Reviewed your PR	96a9c0c	Aug 05, 2026 · 23:32	23:33

[codeant-ai]

---

Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[coderabbitai]

Note

.coderabbit.yaml has unrecognized properties

CodeRabbit is using all valid settings from your configuration. Unrecognized properties (listed below) have been ignored and may indicate typos or deprecated fields that can be removed.

⚠️ Parsing warnings (1)

Validation error: Unrecognized key: "review"

⚙️ Configuration instructions

• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• You can also validate your configuration using the online YAML validator.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Mergify review-request rule now excludes PRs authored by KooshaPari, removes the phenotype/core team target, and retains the configured user reviewer.

Changes

Review request automation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Reviewer targeting rule .mergify.yml	The rule excludes KooshaPari as an author and requests review from the configured user instead of the phenotype/core team.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• KooshaPari/OmniRoute#487: Both PRs modify .mergify.yml reviewer-assignment rules.

Suggested reviewers: copilot

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description explains the configuration change and reason but omits most template sections, including validation, tests, coverage, reviewer notes, and the 71-pillar self-check.	Add the required template sections and record validation results, test status, coverage notes, reviewer notes, and the applicable 71-pillar self-check.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the Mergify configuration fix and replacement of an invalid review team with the owner user.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/mergify-main-team-fix

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

L17 Latency Budget Report

--- Latency Budget Summary ---
  Total endpoints checked: 0
  Passed: 0
  Warnings: 0
  Failures: 0

Checked against: budgets/rest-endpoints.yaml.

[github-actions]

L17 Latency Regression Report

No trace file available — cannot compute regression

Threshold: 10% p99 regression.

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

[kilo-code-bot]

Code Review Summary

Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Files Reviewed (1 file)

• .mergify.yml

---

_{Reviewed by ling-3.0-flash:free · Input: 91.6K · Output: 5.6K · Cached: 192.1K}