fix(review): format detailed findings as distinct sections

[marius-kilocode]

What Problem This Solves

The /review "Detailed Findings" section rendered every finding as the same undifferentiated bullet list, so consecutive findings ran together and were hard to scan.

Why This Change Was Made

Give each finding its own numbered #### heading that restates the severity, file:line, and the short title from the Issues Found table. Confidence, Problem, and Suggestion each start on their own line, and findings are separated by a blank line. The heading cross-references the table row, so the two sections stay in sync.

Evidence

Before, all findings shared one bullet ladder:

- **File:** `path/file.ts:42`
- **Confidence:** 95%
- **Problem:** ...
- **Suggestion:** ...

After, each finding is a distinct section:

#### 1. [CRITICAL] `path/file.ts:42`: Short title

**Confidence:** 95%

**Problem:** ...

**Suggestion:** ...

No code changes; review.txt is imported verbatim as the review command prompt.

[kilo-code-bot]

Code Review Summary

Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Purely a prompt-template formatting change to the /review command output plus a matching patch changeset. The new numbered, severity-tagged #### headings are valid Markdown under the existing ### Detailed Findings section, and the changeset targets @kilocode/cli correctly.

Files Reviewed (2 files)

• .changeset/improve-review-findings-formatting.md
• packages/opencode/src/kilocode/review/review.txt

---

_{Reviewed by deepseek-v4.1-flash · Input: 0 · Output: 0 · Cached: 0}

_{Review guidance: REVIEW.md from base branch main}