feat(agent-manager): scope worktree reviews - #13498
Merged
Merged
Conversation
marius-kilocode
enabled auto-merge
August 27, 2026 07:54
WebReflection
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2026
This was referenced Aug 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What Problem This Solves
/review worktreemust match the full diff shown for an Agent Manager-managed worktree without leaking the worktree-only option into Local, sidebar, or CLI prompts.Why This Change Was Made
The command now reviews committed, staged, unstaged, and untracked changes against the recorded Agent Manager base. It is offered only for an active managed worktree, with imported PR targets and legacy metadata supported.
User Impact
Agent Manager worktree sessions can select
/review worktree. Local sessions, the VS Code sidebar, unassigned sessions, and CLI/TUI surfaces retain the existing review options without exposing the worktree-only scope.Evidence