Skip to content

fix(ci): scope JetBrains checks to relevant changes - #11686

Merged
markijbema merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mark/jetbrains-ci-path-filters
Jun 25, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): scope JetBrains checks to relevant changes#11686
markijbema merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mark/jetbrains-ci-path-filters

Conversation

@markijbema

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Avoid running JetBrains unit tests for changeset-only changes, and apply the same path filtering to JetBrains typechecks. This keeps the required aggregate checks intact while skipping expensive JetBrains jobs for VS Code, docs, and changeset-only PRs.

Co-authored-by: kiloconnect[bot] <240665456+kiloconnect[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@kilo-code-bot

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Code Review Summary

Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Files Reviewed (2 files)
  • .github/workflows/test-jetbrains.yml
  • .github/workflows/typecheck.yml

Reviewed by gpt-5.4-20260305 · Input: 74.3K · Output: 6.8K · Cached: 263.7K

Review guidance: REVIEW.md from base branch main

@markijbema
markijbema enabled auto-merge June 25, 2026 11:13
@markijbema
markijbema merged commit 73944a2 into main Jun 25, 2026
29 of 31 checks passed
@markijbema
markijbema deleted the mark/jetbrains-ci-path-filters branch June 25, 2026 11:14
t7tran pushed a commit to t7tran/kilocode that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2026
…h-filters

fix(ci): scope JetBrains checks to relevant changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants