fix: improve error handling

[saurabhhhcodes]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved keyboard tab switching by ensuring numeric key presses are interpreted consistently as decimal values.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: e7c59522-f699-4f5d-a260-f978000333cb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48f63a1 and 5453df1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• examples/widget-gallery/src/index.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The widget gallery’s handleKey function now parses numeric tab shortcut keys explicitly as base 10.

Changes

Widget gallery tab navigation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Explicit radix for tab shortcuts examples/widget-gallery/src/index.ts	handleKey now calls parseInt with radix 10 when converting key input to a tab index.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Karanjot786/TermUI#3277: Updates the same tab shortcut parsing call in handleKey.
• Karanjot786/TermUI#3283: Contains the matching explicit-radix change in the widget gallery.
• Karanjot786/TermUI#3299: Makes the same parseInt(event.key, 10) update.

Suggested labels: type:bug, area:examples

Suggested reviewers: karanjot786

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title mentions error handling, but the change only forces base-10 parsing for tab switching keys.	Rename it to reflect the actual change, e.g. "fix: parse tab keys as base-10 in widget gallery".
Description check	⚠️ Warning	No PR description was provided, so the required template sections are missing.	Add the template sections: Description, Related Issue, Which package(s), Type of Change, Checklist, and any reviewer notes.

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}