-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
Separate out tests for the GPL build and do not run them when GPL libs are not present #658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
1badb9c to
0cd1754
Compare
…raries are not present. Fix #655
0cd1754 to
2c6b38f
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 84.07% 84.17% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 12 12
Lines 9300 9300
==========================================
+ Hits 7819 7828 +9
+ Misses 1481 1472 -9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
This was merged after the v1.13 split. Should this be backported? |
|
Yes, let's backport. |
…s are not present (#658) Fix #655 The tests marked broken in this PR seem to be an unfortunate regression that doesn't have to do with this PR. @jishnub This seems to have to do with methods that multiply a SparseMatrixCSC with a Diagonal and the behaviour seems right in 1.10, but not in 1.11 and 1.12. --------- Co-authored-by: Viral B. Shah <ViralBShah@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@dkarrasch could this also be ported to 1.12? I'm trying to get a no-gpl release and this blocks that |
…s are not present (#658) Fix #655 The tests marked broken in this PR seem to be an unfortunate regression that doesn't have to do with this PR. @jishnub This seems to have to do with methods that multiply a SparseMatrixCSC with a Diagonal and the behaviour seems right in 1.10, but not in 1.11 and 1.12. --------- Co-authored-by: Viral B. Shah <ViralBShah@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Sure. Sorry I missed the backport label in my last backport PR. |
|
Do we also need a v1.11 backport? I thought we're not releasing in that cycle anymore, but I do see some backport activity over at JuliaLang/julia#60692. |
|
I think it would certainly be useful. |
…s are not present (#658) Fix #655 The tests marked broken in this PR seem to be an unfortunate regression that doesn't have to do with this PR. @jishnub This seems to have to do with methods that multiply a SparseMatrixCSC with a Diagonal and the behaviour seems right in 1.10, but not in 1.11 and 1.12. --------- Co-authored-by: Viral B. Shah <ViralBShah@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix #655
The tests marked broken in this PR seem to be an unfortunate regression that doesn't have to do with this PR. @jishnub This seems to have to do with methods that multiply a SparseMatrixCSC with a Diagonal and the behaviour seems right in 1.10, but not in 1.11 and 1.12.