Skip to content

Conversation

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

@ViralBShah ViralBShah commented Nov 25, 2025

Fix #655

The tests marked broken in this PR seem to be an unfortunate regression that doesn't have to do with this PR. @jishnub This seems to have to do with methods that multiply a SparseMatrixCSC with a Diagonal and the behaviour seems right in 1.10, but not in 1.11 and 1.12.

@ViralBShah ViralBShah added backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 backport 1.11 labels Nov 25, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.17%. Comparing base (26c80c8) to head (229e458).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #658      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.07%   84.17%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines        9300     9300              
==========================================
+ Hits         7819     7828       +9     
+ Misses       1481     1472       -9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ViralBShah ViralBShah merged commit 8b03562 into main Nov 25, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
@ViralBShah ViralBShah deleted the vs/gpl_tests branch November 25, 2025 18:14
@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

This was merged after the v1.13 split. Should this be backported?

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, let's backport.

@ViralBShah ViralBShah added the backport 1.13 Change should be backported to release-1.13 label Dec 23, 2025
dkarrasch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2025
…s are not present (#658)

Fix #655

The tests marked broken in this PR seem to be an unfortunate regression
that doesn't have to do with this PR. @jishnub This seems to have to do
with methods that multiply a SparseMatrixCSC with a Diagonal and the
behaviour seems right in 1.10, but not in 1.11 and 1.12.

---------

Co-authored-by: Viral B. Shah <ViralBShah@users.noreply.github.com>
@dkarrasch dkarrasch mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2025
4 tasks
@gbaraldi
Copy link

@dkarrasch could this also be ported to 1.12? I'm trying to get a no-gpl release and this blocks that

dkarrasch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
…s are not present (#658)

Fix #655

The tests marked broken in this PR seem to be an unfortunate regression
that doesn't have to do with this PR. @jishnub This seems to have to do
with methods that multiply a SparseMatrixCSC with a Diagonal and the
behaviour seems right in 1.10, but not in 1.11 and 1.12.

---------

Co-authored-by: Viral B. Shah <ViralBShah@users.noreply.github.com>
@dkarrasch dkarrasch mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2026
1 task
@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

Sure. Sorry I missed the backport label in my last backport PR.

dkarrasch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
@dkarrasch dkarrasch removed the backport 1.13 Change should be backported to release-1.13 label Jan 15, 2026
@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

Do we also need a v1.11 backport? I thought we're not releasing in that cycle anymore, but I do see some backport activity over at JuliaLang/julia#60692.

dkarrasch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member Author

I think it would certainly be useful.

@dkarrasch dkarrasch removed the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label Jan 16, 2026
dkarrasch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2026
…s are not present (#658)

Fix #655

The tests marked broken in this PR seem to be an unfortunate regression
that doesn't have to do with this PR. @jishnub This seems to have to do
with methods that multiply a SparseMatrixCSC with a Diagonal and the
behaviour seems right in 1.10, but not in 1.11 and 1.12.

---------

Co-authored-by: Viral B. Shah <ViralBShah@users.noreply.github.com>
@dkarrasch dkarrasch mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2026
1 task
dkarrasch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No GPL build fails tests

3 participants