Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow disabling the isidentifier check in build_tarballs #1282

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2024

Conversation

ararslan
Copy link
Member

@ararslan ararslan commented Jun 8, 2023

Validation of the field that will determine the name of the generated JLL package is what you want 99.9% of the time. But that other 0.1% of the time is Yggdrasil/0_RootFS/PlatformSupport/build_tarballs.jl: each invocation of the script specifies a separate platform, the triplet of which gets embedded in the name. Unfortunately e.g. PlatformSupport-x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.2 is not a valid identifier, so building PlatformSupport with recent BinaryBuilder fails.

@ararslan
Copy link
Member Author

ararslan commented Jun 9, 2023

It occurred to me that since #1117 removed the later name validation in favor of doing it early, adding the option to bypass validation here means that you may never validate the name. Not sure whether that's a bug or a feature of this PR but I figure it's worth noting.

Validation of the field that will determine the name of the generated
JLL package is what you want 99.9% of the time. But that other 0.1% of
the time is `Yggdrasil/0_RootFS/PlatformSupport/build_tarballs.jl`: each
invocation of the script specifies a separate platform, the triplet of
which gets embedded in the name. Unfortunately e.g.
`PlatformSupport-x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.2` is not a valid identifier,
so building PlatformSupport with recent BinaryBuilder fails.
@giordano giordano merged commit 5354bfe into master Aug 10, 2024
11 checks passed
@giordano giordano deleted the aa/defer-name-check branch August 10, 2024 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants