-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: Should we backport #8734 to release-0.3 ? #9050
Conversation
objconv cannot do in-place modification of files dont overwrite static library with objcopy on freebsd either fix linking of arpack and suitesparse with 64_ blas suffix the patched xlahqr2 was using UPPERCASE function names, and the probes during arpack configure were using the C compiler, sgemm_ and cheev_ need to enable c preprocessor, and disable syntax error on long lines SPQR also needed -DSUN64 (backport of 1ef22d2)
(backport of 7f596d4)
(manual backport of 02ff762)
(backport of 774f3c9)
081083c
to
8243c5b
Compare
@ViralBShah you seemed to be in favor, go/no go? Any reasons why we shouldn't do this? This shouldn't be a user-facing change at all, except that things that used to be broken due to ILP64 blas interactions should hopefully now be fixed. |
I am in favour of this. |
Dependencies change will affect distro packagers: |
|
RFC: Should we backport #8734 to release-0.3 ?
As far as I can tell this fixed #4923, and aside from a couple of Mac build issues (I've squashed the fixes for those into d297ffb, and I can squash even further if anyone would prefer that) this seems to be working fairly well on master.
Ref #9045