-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
static compile part 3 (modules) #8656
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ecca413
restructure dump.c slightly to make it more flexible
vtjnash 3844d8b
WIP: progress towards serializing/deserializing a single module at a …
vtjnash 530e0d6
WIP: add support for forward value references in the backref table
vtjnash f460d7d
WIP: rehash affected method tables due to datatype->uid changes after…
vtjnash f0a6f98
be alot more careful about serializing types, especially ones that ar…
vtjnash 6b9224a
serialize methlist in reverse order to stabilize method order after d…
vtjnash File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this means
jl_static_show
now might allocate memory, do we need a GC root for the uncompressed ast?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not necessarily, since
jl_uncompress_ast
typically roots it inli->ast
. but perhaps we don't actually want this just because of the allocation (hitting the gc) and the uncompress_ast call (hitting the not-quite-reentrant serializer) and should comment it back out?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No,
jl_uncompress_ast
does not touchli->ast
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, right. i'm preparing another (mostly doc) commit to comment this out