Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix at-[no]inline with short func. def with return type annotation #22174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2017

Conversation

fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

fix #19122

will rebase after #22166

@JeffBezanson
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Could you also put in the suggestion from #22166 (comment) and use is_short_function_def in the generated macro instead, and remove eventually_call? I'll merge #22166 now.

@fredrikekre fredrikekre force-pushed the fe/inline-short-func branch from f356736 to 55180cb Compare June 1, 2017 19:01
@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member Author

Done!

@ararslan ararslan merged commit ef9ab60 into JuliaLang:master Jun 1, 2017
@ararslan
Copy link
Member

ararslan commented Jun 1, 2017

Should this be backported to 0.6?

@fredrikekre fredrikekre deleted the fe/inline-short-func branch June 1, 2017 22:28
tkelman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Error using @inline on function with annotated returned type
4 participants