Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inline some shift operators #22083

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2017
Merged

Inline some shift operators #22083

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2017

Conversation

KristofferC
Copy link
Member

Closes #21241 (checked that performance is fixed).

Don't have time to do a full BaseBenchmarks.jl test right now but tentatively putting a backport label.

inline some shift operators
@Sacha0
Copy link
Member

Sacha0 commented May 27, 2017

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks(ALL, vs = ":master")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here. cc @jrevels

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented May 28, 2017

surprised the speedup isn't visible in those results, isn't this operation already covered in existing benchmarks?

@KristofferC
Copy link
Member Author

No, it doesn't seem like it.

@KristofferC
Copy link
Member Author

Benchmark tag added to #21241

@KristofferC KristofferC merged commit 2c73e9c into master Jun 1, 2017
@KristofferC KristofferC deleted the kc/fix_21241 branch June 1, 2017 21:03
tkelman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
inline some shift operators
(cherry picked from commit 2c73e9c)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Must go faster
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

>>(::Int32, ::Int32) not inlined
4 participants