-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added @macroexpand
#18660
Merged
+87
−0
Merged
added @macroexpand
#18660
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
988f7a1
added @macroexpand
jw3126 bff375b
Update expr.jl
jw3126 0b2c3ca
added @macroexpand to rst
jw3126 2dfe407
fix
jw3126 691052d
fixup: improving docu and removing test/expr.jl
jw3126 ebe9b53
fixup
jw3126 c66c096
Update expr.jl
jw3126 f8157dc
Update choosetests.jl
jw3126 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this isn't the repl if the function is run in a script, is it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me explain it differently. If you call
macroexpand
, the expansion takes place at runtime. If you call@macroexpand
the expansion takes place at compile time (when@macroexpand
is expanded to be more precise.). So the context of@macroexpand
is where it appears in the code, while the context ofmacroexpand
is the current environment. So if you run M.f() from a script, the answer will be(1, whatever @m() currently means in your script)
Does this answer the question?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense. I'm referring to the "where the code was finally called (REPL)." here. I don't see why "(REPL)" is accurate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But in the example it is the REPL?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're making a general statement here "with
macroexpand
the expression expands` ... followed by a very not-general parenthetical that doesn't serve much purposeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
julia>
in the example implies that it runs in the REPL, doesn't it? And the "(moduleM
)" in the sentence before also makes sense only in context of the example. So I'd say either leave as is or rephrase as "(moduleM
in the example)" and "(REPL in the example)" (which I could well do in #18784).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@martinholters I am happy with either formulation, so rephrase it as you see fit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few words saying "in the example" sounds like a good clarification, thanks