-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Make application/julia a text MIME (#18441)
* Make application/julia a text MIME * Use trait instead of istextmime * Add a @pure annotation * Run genstdlib * Move deprecation to deprecated.jl * Use boolean instead of traits * Fix deprecated @textmime * Fix @textmime depwarn message * Undo accidental re-helpdbification
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
66 additions
and
62 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bc9b6ef
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Executing the daily benchmark build, I will reply here when finished:
@nanosoldier
runbenchmarks(ALL, isdaily = true)
bc9b6ef
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here. cc @jrevels
bc9b6ef
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't seem credible that this PR would cause a regression in
["nullable","basic",("isequal","Nullable{BigInt}(1)","Nullable{BigInt}()")]
bc9b6ef
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The nullable benchmarks are a bit too noisy.
bc9b6ef
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I've noted that too. @jrevels Can something be done about it? Or should I just remove these microbenchmarks?
bc9b6ef
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No need to remove benchmarks. I'm just waiting on some tests to pass before I push updated tolerance levels to Nanosoldier. I'm also pushing a a change to BenchmarkTools' GC usage, which should help some benchmarks (though it didn't seem to account for all the noise we generally see).