-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
Do not seed structural zeros #739
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f3340a3
Fix gradient with `LowerTriangular` and `UpperTriangular` input
devmotion 715f4bc
Only seed structurally non-zero entries
devmotion 161d227
Base vector vs chunk mode on structural length
devmotion cf9f4bb
Fix tests
devmotion d2a8af7
Check number of function evaluations and chunk sizes
devmotion File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately this fails if I increase the size of the matrix above the chunk size:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah good catch 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another catch is: This PR doesn't (yet) fix the fact that still for every element of the matrices seeds are generated - even though (IMO) we should limit it to the structurally non-zero entries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have forgotten how all this code works... but 5-arg
seed!implies the iteration is happening elsewhere?The other thing worth checking would be GradientConfig and DiffResult things from https://juliadiff.org/ForwardDiff.jl/stable/user/advanced/ as I'm not sure what paths they take.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah,
seed!(andextract_gradient_chunk!) with > 3 arguments are called if gradients are computed in multiple chunks:ForwardDiff.jl/src/gradient.jl
Lines 118 to 142 in fd2d4a9
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Those look good. Some chance this is flawed copy-pasting at my end, but for chunk mode I see strange effects:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, strange. I get
which seems expected given
ForwardDiff.jl/src/prelude.jl
Lines 10 to 13 in fd2d4a9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only test failures are the ones already present on the master branch (possibly related to some recent changes of acosh or NaNMath.acosh?).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My weird results above must have been my mistake, lazy to check out the branch...
We could add tests of how many executions are used in chunk mode (not sure whether there are any such now) but not essential.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added a test in d2a8af7.