Fix for namespace bug in binary_dual_definition #491
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #491 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.87% 88.87%
=======================================
Files 10 10
Lines 836 836
=======================================
Hits 743 743
Misses 93 93
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
andreasnoack
approved these changes
Jan 4, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ran into a an issue of
@define_binary_dual_opnot defined when trying to define a binary rule within a package (which, AFAIK, requires me to doeval(ForwardDiff.binary_dual_definition(:MyPackage, :myfunc)), thus giving rise to the error).This should fix it.