Commits: JuliaLang/julia@218eeba3b64ecf16dbbb8cc9be47adcd1497e249 vs JuliaLang/julia@001c666086de77101b6937c3d31f0888a35325db
Comparison Diff: link
Triggered By: link
Tag Predicate: "inference"
Note: If Chrome is your browser, I strongly recommend installing the Wide GitHub extension, which makes the result table easier to read.
Below is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks found in
JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl. The values
listed in the ID
column have the structure [parent_group, child_group, ..., key]
,
and can be used to index into the BaseBenchmarks suite to retrieve the corresponding
benchmarks.
The percentages accompanying time and memory values in the below table are noise tolerances. The "true" time/memory value for a given benchmark is expected to fall within this percentage of the reported value.
A ratio greater than 1.0
denotes a possible regression (marked with ❌), while a ratio less
than 1.0
denotes a possible improvement (marked with ✅). Only significant results - results
that indicate possible regressions or improvements - are shown below (thus, an empty table means that all
benchmark results remained invariant between builds).
ID | time ratio | memory ratio |
---|---|---|
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "Base.init_stdio(::Ptr{Cvoid})"] |
1.02 (5%) | 1.02 (1%) ❌ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "REPL.REPLCompletions.completions"] |
1.01 (5%) | 1.02 (1%) ❌ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "broadcasting"] |
1.04 (5%) | 1.06 (1%) ❌ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "many_method_matches"] |
2.90 (5%) ❌ | 2.41 (1%) ❌ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "many_opaque_closures"] |
1.61 (5%) ❌ | 1.69 (1%) ❌ |
["inference", "allinference", "REPL.REPLCompletions.completions"] |
1.02 (5%) | 1.01 (1%) ❌ |
["inference", "optimization", "REPL.REPLCompletions.completions"] |
0.92 (5%) ✅ | 1.00 (1%) |
Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
["inference", "abstract interpretation"]
["inference", "allinference"]
["inference", "optimization"]
Julia Version 1.12.0-DEV.1616
Commit 218eeba3b6 (2024-11-12 16:55 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
uname: Linux 5.15.0-112-generic #122-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 23 07:48:21 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 3500 MHz 654026 s 193 s 171872 s 133586712 s 0 s
#2 3500 MHz 9269451 s 103 s 210552 s 124999498 s 0 s
#3 3501 MHz 499120 s 127 s 78688 s 133889238 s 0 s
#4 3501 MHz 485085 s 108 s 95524 s 133825674 s 0 s
#5 3503 MHz 415124 s 78 s 70000 s 133867553 s 0 s
#6 3501 MHz 450156 s 64 s 91921 s 133205412 s 0 s
#7 3503 MHz 483388 s 118 s 75593 s 133784841 s 0 s
#8 3503 MHz 421916 s 79 s 62309 s 133934342 s 0 s
Memory: 31.30148696899414 GB (18650.859375 MB free)
Uptime: 1.345348231e7 sec
Load Avg: 1.0 1.05 1.92
WORD_SIZE: 64
LLVM: libLLVM-18.1.7 (ORCJIT, haswell)
Threads: 1 default, 0 interactive, 1 GC (on 8 virtual cores)
Julia Version 1.12.0-DEV.1614
Commit 001c666086 (2024-11-12 01:58 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
uname: Linux 5.15.0-112-generic #122-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 23 07:48:21 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 3499 MHz 654281 s 193 s 171959 s 133601271 s 0 s
#2 3500 MHz 9283253 s 103 s 210565 s 125000620 s 0 s
#3 3501 MHz 499796 s 127 s 78701 s 133903481 s 0 s
#4 3501 MHz 485178 s 108 s 95529 s 133840508 s 0 s
#5 3501 MHz 415142 s 78 s 70003 s 133882457 s 0 s
#6 3501 MHz 450292 s 64 s 91926 s 133220177 s 0 s
#7 3503 MHz 483709 s 118 s 75600 s 133799448 s 0 s
#8 3501 MHz 421948 s 79 s 62312 s 133949242 s 0 s
Memory: 31.30148696899414 GB (18662.97265625 MB free)
Uptime: 1.3454976e7 sec
Load Avg: 1.0 1.0 1.17
WORD_SIZE: 64
LLVM: libLLVM-18.1.7 (ORCJIT, haswell)
Threads: 1 default, 0 interactive, 1 GC (on 8 virtual cores)