You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
By default, tags are sorted by creation date, as stated on #45
However they are sorted in ascending order, so latest image is at the bottom of the page.
I think it would be better the other way around.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thank you for using my project and posting feature requests 😄
This is a simple and nice idea, I will take care of it and add a new configuration DEFAULT_TAG_ORDER 👍
Create new option named `TAGLIST_ORDER` that will order tags using user defined configuration.
Available values are:
| value | description |
| --- | --- |
| `num-asc;alpha-asc` | Numbers come first in **ascending** order then alphabet in **ascending** order |
| `num-desc;alpha-asc` | Numbers come first in **descending** order then alphabet in **ascending** order |
| `num-asc;alpha-desc` | Numbers come first in **ascending** order then alphabet in **descending** order |
| `num-desc;alpha-desc` | Numbers come first in **descending** order then alphabet in **descending** order |
| `alpha-asc;num-asc` | Alphabet come first in **ascending** order then numbers in **ascending** order |
| `alpha-asc;num-desc` (default) | Alphabet come first in **ascending** order then numbers in **descending** order |
| `alpha-desc;num-asc` | Alphabet come first in **descending** order then numbers in **ascending** order |
| `alpha-desc;num-desc` | Alphabet come first in **descending** order then numbers in **descending** order |
Some examples in [test/taglist-order.test.js](https://github.com/Joxit/docker-registry-ui/blob/8bbfc5c390c334e66741d5a639d4b17c8fe6fcea/test/taglist-order.test.js)
closes#294
By default, tags are sorted by creation date, as stated on #45
However they are sorted in ascending order, so latest image is at the bottom of the page.
I think it would be better the other way around.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: