Hotfix/cd emis kmtx#221
Conversation
Minor modification to CRTM test: including amusa test over water covered surface
|
Note that commit 964e34e reverted the changes to surface types. |
|
When I compare to develop, I get |
|
Good catch. Yes. I forgot to add that a lot k-matrix/ad tests should fail with the updated surface emissivity Jacobians. Mostly for variable: RTSolution_K%Surface_Emissivity and RTSolution_AD%Surface_Emissivity Here is a list of failed test from my end: |
|
Could you add which tests are reporting these failures? All my tests failed due to |
|
|
I also wonder why some of the |
It is also due to surface emissivity bug fix in function Most AD tests from my end failed, tests # 154-170. It seems our total number of tests are different (likely due to the added amsua_n19 from this branch, which brings a total of 191 tests from this branch). But some did pass, the same applies to K_matrix tests. Let me dig more I don't see any Atmosphere_K Jacobians failures though |
|
This is a list of k_matrix/AD tests that passed due to different reasons:
a). The following tests passed due to Azimuth_Fourier_Loop setup discussed here #222 (comment) b). The following tests passed because c). The following tests are newly introduced by this branch, therefore passed
|
|
@BenjaminTJohnson Please see the updated notes on why certain tests failed/passed. |
|
Is there a timeline for fixing ctests and merging this PR into the develop? |
Description
Surface emissivity Jacobian bug fix PR
Issue(s) addressed
Resolves #217
Dependencies
None
Impact
Expect changes in value of surface emissivity Jacobians
Know impacts on qc tests
Checklist