SCP-2370: let minting policies take redeemers #3400
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is really only the beginning of this: it completely punts on handling actually passing the redeemers around properly, instead just conjuring `()` in all cases. The main point of this is so that downstream can use our libraries to make minting policies that will work with the real ledger, which will pass the extra argument (and does already handle the redeemers). I will make a follow-up PR for actually doing things properly, but it's a bit of a rabbit-hole, so I thought I should get this one done first.
michaelpj
force-pushed
the
mpj/redeemer-minting-minimal
branch
from
07bc516
to
c0f1932
Compare
|
I'm being pushy on this but do take a look later. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is really only the beginning of this: it completely punts on
handling actually passing the redeemers around properly, instead just
conjuring
()in all cases. The main point of this is so thatdownstream can use our libraries to make minting policies that will work
with the real ledger, which will pass the extra argument (and does
already handle the redeemers).
I will make a follow-up PR for actually doing things properly, but it's
a bit of a rabbit-hole, so I thought I should get this one done first.
Pre-submit checklist:
Pre-merge checklist: