Skip to content

beta10/snyk #135

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
pcheremu wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

beta10/snyk #135

pcheremu wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@pcheremu
Copy link

@pcheremu pcheremu commented Oct 15, 2020

No description provided.

@pcheremu pcheremu requested a review from DmitryKizaev October 15, 2020 11:06
@PokhodenkoSA
Copy link
Contributor

PokhodenkoSA commented Oct 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

@pcheremu the only requirement for snyk is adding requirements.txt ?
Could you please provide instruction for preparing packages for snyc?
I think developers could adjust their packages better if instruction will be pretty clean.

@PokhodenkoSA PokhodenkoSA mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2020
Closed
32 tasks
@DmitryKizaev
Copy link
Contributor

DmitryKizaev commented Oct 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

@pcheremu the only requirement for snyk is adding requirements.txt ?
Could you please provide instruction for preparing packages for snyc?
I think developers could adjust their packages better if instruction will be pretty clean.

@PokhodenkoSA, for Beta10 we got a task to provide snyk scan as soon as possible. Adding requirements.txt based on 'run' section of meta.yaml file into repository was kind of backup way to do it fast. Fortunately, Pavel managed to create automatic configuration for Snyk in time, so I think maintaining requirements file in repo is not needed any more, and this can be closed.

@DmitryKizaev DmitryKizaev deleted the beta10/snyk branch October 19, 2020 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@DmitryKizaev DmitryKizaev Awaiting requested review from DmitryKizaev

@PokhodenkoSA PokhodenkoSA Awaiting requested review from PokhodenkoSA

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

gold

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pcheremu @PokhodenkoSA @DmitryKizaev