We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I stumbled across the following unsatisfiable classes in STATO in encountering them in the MS ontology:
Here is the explanation for STATO_0000046 being unsatisfiable:
What had me perplexed is that when reasoning on STATO, these unsatisfiable classes do not show up, when in fact they should.
The reason why these unsatisfiable classes are not showing up in STATO is that STATO are missing some axioms that are not imported from BFO and RO:
BFO: BFO_0000002 DisjointWith BFO_0000003 RO: BFO_0000051 o RO_0000057 SubPropertyOf: RO_0000057
BFO_0000002 DisjointWith BFO_0000003
BFO_0000051 o RO_0000057 SubPropertyOf: RO_0000057
Adding these axioms to STATO and running the reasoner gives the exact same unsatisfiable classes encountered in MS:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @henrietteharmse ,
Thank you for reporting the issue and for providing a solution. I need to dig into why these axioms aren't pulled.
Sorry, something went wrong.
continuant
occurrent
'has part' o 'has participant'
has participant
8a94c62
Merge pull request #92 from ISA-tools/issue-90
b5efead
fixes #90 - adding missing disjoint axioms between occurrent and cont…
No branches or pull requests
I stumbled across the following unsatisfiable classes in STATO in encountering them in the MS ontology:
Here is the explanation for STATO_0000046 being unsatisfiable:
What had me perplexed is that when reasoning on STATO, these unsatisfiable classes do not show up, when in fact they should.
The reason why these unsatisfiable classes are not showing up in STATO is that STATO are missing some axioms that are not imported from BFO and RO:
BFO:
BFO_0000002 DisjointWith BFO_0000003
RO:
BFO_0000051 o RO_0000057 SubPropertyOf: RO_0000057
Adding these axioms to STATO and running the reasoner gives the exact same unsatisfiable classes encountered in MS:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: