-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 353
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: fix pretty-printing of imports for static methods #3716
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c1c5eed
test: add a test on printing a class with a static import of a method
danglotb 5d87481
test: add test resources
danglotb d09984a
test: replace assertTrue(contains()) by assertEquals()
danglotb 2dd465d
fix: in case of static executable reference, we do need to add the im…
danglotb 65e1516
test: strengthen the unit test with a non static method call
danglotb 3d9b2cb
style: fix the issue about checkstyle
danglotb 15dc292
Update DefaultPrettyPrinterTest.java
monperrus File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions
17
src/test/java/spoon/test/prettyprinter/testclasses/ClassUsingStaticMethod.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
package spoon.test.prettyprinter.testclasses; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* @author Benjamin DANGLOT | ||
* [email protected] | ||
* 02/12/2020 | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
import static spoon.test.prettyprinter.testclasses.ClassWithStaticMethod.findFirst; | ||
public class ClassUsingStaticMethod { | ||
|
||
public void callFindFirst() { | ||
findFirst(); | ||
new ClassWithStaticMethod().notStaticFindFirst(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions
18
src/test/java/spoon/test/prettyprinter/testclasses/ClassWithStaticMethod.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
package spoon.test.prettyprinter.testclasses; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* @author Benjamin DANGLOT | ||
* [email protected] | ||
* 02/12/2020 | ||
*/ | ||
public class ClassWithStaticMethod { | ||
|
||
void notStaticFindFirst() { | ||
System.out.println(""); | ||
} | ||
|
||
static void findFirst() { | ||
System.out.println(""); | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about keeping
target != null
to avoid crashing with NPE ontarget.isImplicit
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check is redundant with the check just above(here):
If
target == null
, the conditiontarget.isImplicit()
will not be hit, isn't?