Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 9, 2023. It is now read-only.

Update snyk to 1.14.1 #428

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2016
Merged

Update snyk to 1.14.1 #428

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2016

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚨🚨🚨

snyk just published its new version 1.14.1, which is covered by your current version range. After updating it in your project the build went from success to failure.

This means your software is now malfunctioning, because of this update. Use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


GitHub Release

1.14.1 (2016-04-20)

Bug Fixes

  • bump snyk-policy for same vuln.id fix (4ce30109)
  • ensure dedupe orders by most recent pub date (f5856bfb)

The new version differs by 28 commits .

  • 4ce3010 fix: bump snyk-policy for same vuln.id fix
  • 5e325f0 chore: de-ES6ify
  • f5856bf fix: ensure dedupe orders by most recent pub date
  • c04c9e5 style: linting fixes
  • 656affe chore: add tmp to ignore files
  • ceb547c test: add files for SC-1076
  • 0202bf0 chore: linting and give tests es6 support
  • 09723ef test: make hotload use relative path
  • ec1544f fix: don't add policy to git if in ci
  • 2053268 test: ignore released branches
  • 9e8efed refactor: remove support command completely
  • f7a992b test: analytic changes
  • f7afa70 fix: undefined@undefined appearing in analytics
  • 0b79c74 fix: snyk test with vulns is not a bad command
  • e1f75e7 fix: add policy file to git

There are 28 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚡

@jkleinsc jkleinsc changed the title [email protected] breaks build 🚨 Update snyk to 1.14.1 Apr 21, 2016
@jkleinsc jkleinsc merged commit 8b825e5 into master Apr 21, 2016
@jkleinsc jkleinsc deleted the greenkeeper-snyk-1.14.1 branch April 21, 2016 16:46
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants