Skip to content

Conversation

@fishtreesugar
Copy link
Contributor

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

#67284

@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot added the haskell Haskell use is a significant feature of the PR or issue label Dec 22, 2020
@fishtreesugar fishtreesugar mentioned this pull request Dec 22, 2020
@SeekingMeaning SeekingMeaning added the cabal v1 deprecation Deprecate cabal sandbox label Dec 22, 2020
@SeekingMeaning SeekingMeaning added the automerge-skip `brew pr-automerge` will skip this pull request label Dec 22, 2020
SeekingMeaning
SeekingMeaning previously approved these changes Dec 22, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@SeekingMeaning SeekingMeaning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @fishtreesugar!

@SeekingMeaning SeekingMeaning changed the title patch elm formula to build on cabal-install-3.2 elm: add patch to build on cabal-install-3.2 Dec 22, 2020
@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot removed the automerge-skip `brew pr-automerge` will skip this pull request label Dec 22, 2020
@BrewTestBot
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 A scheduled task has triggered a merge.

@fishtreesugar fishtreesugar deleted the elm-cabal-install-3.2 branch December 23, 2020 01:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cabal v1 deprecation Deprecate cabal sandbox haskell Haskell use is a significant feature of the PR or issue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants