openjdk 26.0.1 by ashr123 · Pull Request #279619 · Homebrew/homebrew-core

ashr123 · 2026-04-27T09:25:34Z

Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>?
Is your test running fine brew test <formula>?
Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

AI was used to generate or assist with generating this PR. Please specify below how you used AI to help you, and what steps you have taken to manually verify the changes.

github-actions · 2026-04-27T09:30:22Z

Thanks for contributing to Homebrew! 🎉 It looks like you're having trouble with a CI failure. See our contribution guide for help. You may be most interested in the section on dealing with CI failures. You can find the CI logs in the Checks tab of your pull request.

ashr123 · 2026-04-27T09:38:07Z

I’ll be happy for some help as I don’t know what is missing

ashr123 · 2026-04-27T09:39:41Z

help wanted

ashr123 · 2026-04-27T09:42:44Z

@copilot help wanted, fix this PR

cv3x · 2026-04-28T07:13:15Z

Perhaps it would make more sense to introduce a dedicated openjdk@25.rb formula for the current LTS release, as mentioned in my earlier comment here.

Then, for this openjdk.rb formula tracking the latest release, you could add an openjdk@26 alias to reflect the current version.

ashr123 · 2026-04-28T08:45:58Z

@Calvinit I'll be able to handle it on the 30th

GunniBusch · 2026-04-28T10:24:13Z

Perhaps it would make more sense to introduce a dedicated openjdk@25.rb formula for the current LTS release, as mentioned in my earlier comment here.

Then, for this openjdk.rb formula tracking the latest release, you could add an openjdk@26 alias to reflect the current version.

I think we should do it the other way around. Have the non lts version versioned and the unversioned is the lts

ashr123 · 2026-04-30T15:19:33Z

@GunniBusch I don’t think this is how it is currently works, as I see, only LTS versions are versioned and openjdk.rb contains the latest formula

ashr123 · 2026-04-30T22:43:21Z

@calvinit, @GunniBusch it seems like the following caused the failuer this time:

brew test --retry --verbose glassfish
brew test --retry --verbose opensearch

Can you elaborate on that?

github-actions · 2026-05-01T00:02:34Z

Caution

Please do not modify the bottle block. Bottle block modifications can cause CI to misbehave.
@BrewTestBot will handle updating the bottle block before this PR is merged.

ashr123 · 2026-05-01T00:07:25Z

See #278720

github-actions · 2026-05-01T00:10:33Z

Caution

Please do not modify the bottle block. Bottle block modifications can cause CI to misbehave.
@BrewTestBot will handle updating the bottle block before this PR is merged.

github-actions · 2026-05-01T00:19:47Z

Caution

Please do not modify the bottle block. Bottle block modifications can cause CI to misbehave.
@BrewTestBot will handle updating the bottle block before this PR is merged.

GunniBusch · 2026-05-01T13:49:22Z

it seems like the following caused the failuer this time:
brew test --retry --verbose glassfish
brew test --retry --verbose opensearch
Can you elaborate on that?

Everything that doesn’t work with 26.0.1, just replace openjdk with openjdk@25 inkl. all the references inside the formulae.

cv3x · 2026-05-19T08:35:55Z

What do we need to do now to move this PR forward?

I asked GitHub Copilot, and its suggestion was:

Re-run the PR with CI-no-fail-fast-deps so the cancelled tests run does not cause test_deps to be skipped.

GunniBusch · 2026-05-19T12:37:51Z

What do we need to do now to move this PR forward?

I asked GitHub Copilot, and its suggestion was:

Re-run the PR with CI-no-fail-fast-deps so the cancelled tests run does not cause test_deps to be skipped.

We can’t test deps if the formulae whose deps to test were not build.

Co-authored-by: Roy Ash <roy.ash456@gmail.com>

github-actions · 2026-05-20T06:19:14Z

@carlocab has requested bottles to be published to this PR.

Caution

Please do not push to this PR branch before the bottle commits have been pushed, as this results in a state that is difficult to recover from. If you need to resolve a merge conflict, please use a merge commit. Do not force-push to this PR branch.

ashr123 · 2026-05-20T09:30:31Z

I've executed

brew update -f && brew upgrade
brew install openjdk@26

but I got

Warning: No available formula with the name "openjdk@26". Did you mean openjdk, openjdk@21, openjdk@8, openjdk@17 or openjdk@11?

Why is that?

daeho-ro · 2026-05-20T10:41:44Z

Rebottle for arm is done.
In order to get the latest one, brew upgrade openjdk or install.

github-actions Bot added CI-build-dependents-from-source Pass --build-dependents-from-source to brew test-bot. long dependent tests Set a long timeout for dependent testing labels Apr 27, 2026

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

cv3x mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2026

bigloo: update checksum #223428

Closed

6 tasks

ashr123 force-pushed the openjdk-26 branch from 1ac6fcc to 658329f Compare April 30, 2026 15:32

github-actions Bot added automerge-skip `brew pr-automerge` will skip this pull request alias labels Apr 30, 2026

ashr123 force-pushed the openjdk-26 branch from 658329f to 0a8734e Compare May 1, 2026 00:01

github-actions Bot added the new formula PR adds a new formula to Homebrew/homebrew-core label May 1, 2026

ashr123 force-pushed the openjdk-26 branch from 0a8734e to 979c6e2 Compare May 1, 2026 00:05

ashr123 force-pushed the openjdk-26 branch from 496cff8 to d32d4a3 Compare May 1, 2026 00:18

ashr123 force-pushed the openjdk-26 branch from d32d4a3 to 7b46578 Compare May 1, 2026 08:58

SMillerDev reviewed May 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread Formula/o/openjdk@25.rb

ashr123 force-pushed the openjdk-26 branch from 29b813b to 8b5d824 Compare May 1, 2026 12:21

This was referenced May 1, 2026

Openjdk 26 temp #280436

Closed

Openjdk 26 adding deprecation to unsupported versions #280437

Closed

MikeMcQuaid removed request for MikeMcQuaid, SMillerDev and daeho-ro May 18, 2026 11:33

SMillerDev and others added 7 commits May 19, 2026 17:23

openjdk 26.0.1

5490c1c

Co-authored-by: Roy Ash <roy.ash456@gmail.com>

openjdk@25: 25.0.3 (new formula)

cf9dcf8

Co-authored-by: Roy Ash <roy.ash456@gmail.com>

beast: use openjdk@25

f0fbb35

Co-authored-by: Roy Ash <roy.ash456@gmail.com>

glassfish: use openjdk@25

00a15f6

Co-authored-by: Roy Ash <roy.ash456@gmail.com>

graalvm: use openjdk@25

d5dd197

Co-authored-by: Roy Ash <roy.ash456@gmail.com>

opensearch: use openjdk@25

dccd98f

Co-authored-by: Roy Ash <roy.ash456@gmail.com>

metals: use openjdk@25

2a89d3f

Co-authored-by: Roy Ash <roy.ash456@gmail.com>

SMillerDev force-pushed the openjdk-26 branch from 6daae20 to 2a89d3f Compare May 19, 2026 14:24

carlocab approved these changes May 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

carlocab added 7 commits May 20, 2026 06:25

beast: update 10.5.0 bottle.

8b029ef

glassfish: update 8.0.2 bottle.

5d165ca

graalvm: update 25.0.2 bottle.

edc722f

metals: update 1.6.7 bottle.

a5d93f9

openjdk: update 26.0.1 bottle.

4f50007

openjdk@25: add 25.0.3 bottle.

500ddfd

opensearch: update 3.6.0 bottle.

da2782d

github-actions Bot added the CI-published-bottle-commits The commits for the built bottles have been pushed to the PR branch. label May 20, 2026

github-actions Bot approved these changes May 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

BrewTestBot enabled auto-merge May 20, 2026 06:35

BrewTestBot added this pull request to the merge queue May 20, 2026

Merged via the queue into Homebrew:main with commit 5975e29 May 20, 2026
20 checks passed

Uh oh!

Conversation

ashr123 commented Apr 27, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Uh oh!

ashr123 commented Apr 27, 2026

Uh oh!

ashr123 commented Apr 27, 2026

Uh oh!

ashr123 commented Apr 27, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as resolved.

cv3x commented Apr 28, 2026

Uh oh!

ashr123 commented Apr 28, 2026

Uh oh!

GunniBusch commented Apr 28, 2026

Uh oh!

ashr123 commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

ashr123 commented Apr 30, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 1, 2026

Uh oh!

ashr123 commented May 1, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 1, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 1, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

GunniBusch commented May 1, 2026

Uh oh!

cv3x commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

GunniBusch commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 20, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ashr123 commented May 20, 2026

Uh oh!

daeho-ro commented May 20, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants